Comparative Study
doi: 10.3758/bf03211493.
Positive effect of heterogeneity of difference on the same-different disparity in letter matching
- PMID: 3725535
- DOI: 10.3758/bf03211493
Item in Clipboard
Comparative Study
Positive effect of heterogeneity of difference on the same-different disparity in letter matching
Percept Psychophys.
1986 Feb.
No abstract available
Similar articles
-
Development of letter-specific processing: the effect of reading ability.Acta Psychol (Amst). 2006 May;122(1):99-108. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.11.005. Epub 2006 Jan 18. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2006. PMID: 16414004
-
Impact of stimulus integrity on age differences in letter matching.Exp Aging Res. 2003 Apr-Jun;29(2):155-72. doi: 10.1080/03610730303714. Exp Aging Res. 2003. PMID: 12623726 Clinical Trial.
-
Kindergarten risk factors, cognitive factors, and teacher judgments as predictors of early reading in Dutch.J Learn Disabil. 2006 Nov-Dec;39(6):558-71. doi: 10.1177/00222194060390060701. J Learn Disabil. 2006. PMID: 17165622
-
[Effects of structural and naming factors of letters upon the recognition of tachistoscopic letters (author's transl)].Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 1981 Apr;52(1):61-4. Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 1981. PMID: 7300053 Japanese.
-
Mirrors are hard to break: A critical review and behavioral evidence on mirror-image processing in developmental dyslexia.J Exp Child Psychol. 2017 Jul;159:66-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.02.003. Epub 2017 Mar 9. J Exp Child Psychol. 2017. PMID: 28285044 Review.
Cited by
-
Instructional and probability manipulations of bias in multiletter matching.Percept Psychophys. 1989 Jan;45(1):55-65. doi: 10.3758/bf03208033. Percept Psychophys. 1989. PMID: 2913571
-
A response-selection basis for the mixed-category, repeated-stimulus inferiority effect.Percept Psychophys. 1988 Aug;44(2):182-90. doi: 10.3758/bf03208711. Percept Psychophys. 1988. PMID: 3405745 No abstract available.