Gender-Affirming Vaginoplasty: A Comparison of Algorithms, Surgical Techniques and Management Practices across 17 High-volume Centers in North America and Europe
- PMID: 37255762
- PMCID: PMC10226616
- DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005033
Gender-Affirming Vaginoplasty: A Comparison of Algorithms, Surgical Techniques and Management Practices across 17 High-volume Centers in North America and Europe
Abstract
Penile inversion vaginoplasty is the most common gender-affirming genital surgery performed around the world. Although individual centers have published their experiences, expert consensus is generally lacking.
Methods: Semistructured interviews were performed with 17 experienced gender surgeons representing a diverse mix of specialties, experience, and countries regarding their patient selection, preoperative management, vaginoplasty techniques, complication management, and postoperative protocols.
Results: There is significant consistency in practices across some aspects of vaginoplasty. However, key areas of clinical heterogeneity are also present and include use of extragenital tissue for vaginal canal/apex creation, creation of the clitoral hood and inner labia minora, elevation of the neoclitoral neurovascular bundle, and perioperative hormone management. Pathway length of stay is highly variable (1-9 days). Lastly, some surgeons are moving toward continuation or partial reduction of estrogen in the perioperative period instead of cessation.
Conclusions: With a broad study of surgeon practices, and encompassing most of the high-volume vaginoplasty centers in Europe and North America, we found key areas of practice variation that represent areas of priority for future research to address. Further multi-institutional and prospective studies that incorporate patient-reported outcomes are necessary to further our understanding of these procedures.
Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no financial intersts to declare in relation to the content of this article.
References
-
- Oles N, Darrach H, Landford W, et al. . Gender affirming surgery: a comprehensive, systematic review of all peer-reviewed literature and methods of assessing patient-centered outcomes (part 1: breast/chest, face, and voice). Ann Surg. 2020;275:e52–e66. - PubMed
-
- ASPS 2019 Statistics. 2020. Available at https://www.plasticsurgery.org/documents/News/Statistics/2019/plastic-su...
-
- Shen JK, Seebacher NA, Morrison SD. global interest in gender affirmation surgery: a Google trends analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;143:254e–256e. - PubMed
-
- Calotta NA, Kuzon W, Dellon AL, et al. . Sensibility, sensation, and nerve regeneration after reconstructive genital surgery: evolving concepts in neurobiology. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021;147:995e–1003e. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous