Impact of macroscopic on-site evaluation on the diagnostic outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration
- PMID: 37260107
- DOI: 10.1002/dc.25175
Impact of macroscopic on-site evaluation on the diagnostic outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration
Abstract
Background: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided tissue acquisition is the preferred modality for diagnosing pancreatic lesions and mediastinal and abdominal lymph nodes. Rapid on-site cytologic evaluation improves the diagnostic outcome of EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) but is unavailable at many centers. Alternatively, macroscopic on-site evaluation (MOSE) may improve the diagnostic outcome of EUS-FNA, but data are limited. Hence, the present study was conducted to assess the efficacy of MOSE in improving adequacy and accuracy.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data of consecutive patients with pancreatic or lymph nodal lesions undergoing EUS-guided FNA at a tertiary care center from December 2020 to December 2022. The study's primary outcomes were adequacy and diagnostic accuracy of the EUS-guided tissue acquisition, with secondary analysis of predictors of adequacy and accuracy.
Results: Data from 124 patients (44.4% male, median age: 54 years) who underwent EUS-FNA were included in the present analysis. The presence of macroscopic visible core (MVC) on MOSE was reported in 93/124 (75%) cases. An adequate sample for histopathological or cytological examination was obtained in 110/124 (88.7%) cases, while the diagnostic accuracy was 85.5%. On multivariate analysis, the absence of MVC on MOSE was found to be the independent negative predictor of both adequacy (OR 0.092, 95% CI: 0.024-0.349) and accuracy (OR 0.175, 95% CI: 0.057-0.536).
Conclusion: The presence of MVC on MOSE can be an indicator of specimen adequacy and can improve the diagnostic yield of EUS-FNA.
Keywords: endoscopic ultrasound; fine-needle aspiration; lymph node; macroscopic on-site evaluation; pancreatic mass.
© 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Rana A, Rana SS. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition: techniques and challenges. J Cytol. 2019;36:1-7.
-
- Khan MA, Grimm IS, Ali B, et al. A meta-analysis of endoscopic ultrasound-fine-needle aspiration compared to endoscopic ultrasound-fine-needle biopsy: diagnostic yield and the value of on-site cytopathological assessment. Endosc Int Open. 2017;5:E363-E375.
-
- Iwashita T, Yasuda I, Mukai T, et al. Macroscopic on-site quality evaluation of biopsy specimens to improve the diagnostic accuracy during EUS-guided FNA using a 19-gauge needle for solid lesions: a single-center prospective pilot study (MOSE study). Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:177-185.
-
- Mangiavillano B, Crinò SF, Facciorusso A, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy with or without macroscopic on-site evaluation: a randomized controlled noninferiority trial. Endoscopy. 2023;55:129-137.
-
- Mohan BP, Madhu D, Reddy N, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling by macroscopic on-site evaluation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2022;96:909-917.e11.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
