Probiotic-Associated Central Venous Catheter Bloodstream Infections Lead to Increased Mortality in the ICU
- PMID: 37260310
- DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005953
Probiotic-Associated Central Venous Catheter Bloodstream Infections Lead to Increased Mortality in the ICU
Abstract
Objectives: To determine the occurrence rate and impact on patient outcomes of probiotic-associated central venous catheter bloodstream infections in the ICU.
Design: Retrospective observational cohort study.
Setting: The cohort was gathered using HCA Healthcare's data warehouse.
Patients: Adult patients with central venous catheters in the ICU.
Interventions: None.
Measurements and main results: Blood culture data were used to determine whether an infection had occurred with an organism contained in an administered probiotic. Eighty-six probiotic-associated central venous catheter bloodstream infections were identified among the 23,015 patient cohort who received probiotics (0.37%). The number needed to harm was 270. Zero infections were found in the cohort that did not receive probiotics. Patients who contracted a probiotic infection had increased mortality (odds ratio, 2.23; 1.30-3.71; p < 0.01). Powder formulations had an increased rate of infection compared with nonpowder formulations (0.76% vs 0.33%; odds ratio, 2.03; 1.05-3.95; p = 0.04).
Conclusions: Probiotic administration is associated with a substantial rate of probiotic-associated bloodstream infection in ICU patients with central venous catheters in place. Probiotic-associated bloodstream infections result in significantly increased mortality. Powder formulations cause bloodstream infections more frequently than nonpowder formulations. In ICU patients with central venous catheters, the risks of probiotic-associated central venous catheter bloodstream infection and death outweigh any potential benefits of probiotic administration.
Copyright © 2023 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Mr. Cornett received funding from HCA Healthcare. The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.
Comment in
-
Primum Non Nocere: Time to Rethink Probiotic Therapy.Crit Care Med. 2023 Nov 1;51(11):1592-1593. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005977. Epub 2023 Oct 12. Crit Care Med. 2023. PMID: 37902343 No abstract available.
References
-
- Doron SI, Hibberd PL, Gorbach SL: Probiotics for prevention of antibiotic-associated diarrhea. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2008; 42(Suppl 2):S58–S63
-
- McFarland LV: Use of probiotics to correct dysbiosis of normal microbiota following disease or disruptive events: A systematic review. BMJ Open. 2014; 4:e005047
-
- Lherm T, Claire M, et al.: Seven cases of fungemia with Saccharomyces boulardii in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med. 2002; 28:797–801
-
- Santino I, Alari A, Bono S, et al.: Saccharomyces cerevisiae fungemia, a possible consequence of the treatment of Clostridium difficile colitis with a probioticum. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2014; 27:143–146
-
- Castagliuolo I, Riegler MF, Valenick L, et al.: Saccharomyces Boulardii protease inhibits the effects of Clostridium difficile toxins A and B in human colonic mucosa. Infect Immun. 1999; 67:302–307
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical