Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May 30;6(5):e1239.
doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1239. eCollection 2023 May.

Euthanasia in Africa: A scoping review of empirical evidence

Jimoh Amzat  1   2 , Kehinde Kazeem Kanmodi  3   4   5 , Abbas Ismail  6 , Eyinade Adeduntan Egbedina  3
Affiliations

Euthanasia in Africa: A scoping review of empirical evidence

Jimoh Amzat et al. Health Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Background and aims: The core ethical perplexity is that physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia (PAS/E) contradicts the core value of medical practice which is about the duty of care to preserve life. While most arguments for and against euthanasia emerge from other continents, no African country legalizes or decriminalizes PAS/E. The essence of this scoping review is to collate evidence and scientific voices on euthanasia in Africa by synthesizing empirical articles on the subject in Africa.

Methods: In this scoping review, a systematic search of five electronic research databases-PubMed, SCOPUS, CINHAL Complete, Allied and Complementary Medicine (AMED), and APA PsycInfo-was conducted to identify relevant articles conducted in Africa on euthanasia. After deduplication with the Rayyan software, the retrieved literature were screened for eligibility, and only eligible articles were included in the review. Relevant data from these articles were extracted and analyzed using narrative synthesis.

Results: Only 14 articles reporting empirical studies, conducted in Africa, and published in English, were included in the review after a rigorous screening process. The review shows a wide rejection of euthanasia, but there is not much resistance to passive euthanasia, that is, withholding/withdrawing life-saving medical care from a terminally ill patient, mostly due to advanced age of the patient and the incurability of the illness. Many factors, such as religion, profession, and age help in shaping the way an individual view and understand PAS/E. Professionals take the patient's clinical condition and sociocultural context into consideration when making decisions about end-of-life care. The sociocultural context did not favor PAS/E.

Conclusion: Euthanasia will continue to be a subject of controversy and debate in Africa and elsewhere. The majority of Africans hold the duty of care and preservation of life as the hallmark of medical practice, which informs the wide rejection of PAS/E.

Keywords: Africa; euthanasia; mercy killing; scoping review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Kehinde Kazeem Kanmodi is an Editorial Board member of Health Science Reports and a coauthor of this article. To minimize bias, they were excluded from all editorial decision‐making related to the acceptance of this article for publication. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of literature search and sorting process.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Annadurai K, Danasekaran R, Mani G. Euthanasia: right to die with dignity. J Family Med Prim Care. 2014;3(4):477‐478. 10.4103/2249-4863.148161 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brassington I. What passive euthanasia is. BMC Med Ethics. 2020;21(1):41. 10.1186/s12910-020-00481-7 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Goligher EC, Ely EW, Sulmasy DP, et al. Physician‐assisted suicide and euthanasia in the ICU: a dialogue on core ethical issues. Crit Care Med. 2017;45(2):149‐155. 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001818 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fontalis A, Prousali E, Kulkarni K. Euthanasia and assisted dying: what is the current position and what are the key arguments informing the debate? J R Soc Med. 2018;111(11):407‐413. 10.1177/0141076818803452 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Salas SP, Salinas RA, Besio M, et al. [Ethical arguments for and against the participation of the medical profession in assisted death: analysis of the Ethics Department of the Chilean Medical Association]. Rev Med Chil. 2020;148(4):542‐547. 10.4067/s0034-98872020000400542 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources