Humanizing AI in medical training: ethical framework for responsible design
- PMID: 37261331
- PMCID: PMC10227566
- DOI: 10.3389/frai.2023.1189914
Humanizing AI in medical training: ethical framework for responsible design
Abstract
The increasing use of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare has brought about numerous ethical considerations that push for reflection. Humanizing AI in medical training is crucial to ensure that the design and deployment of its algorithms align with ethical principles and promote equitable healthcare outcomes for both medical practitioners trainees and patients. This perspective article provides an ethical framework for responsibly designing AI systems in medical training, drawing on our own past research in the fields of electrocardiogram interpretation training and e-health wearable devices. The article proposes five pillars of responsible design: transparency, fairness and justice, safety and wellbeing, accountability, and collaboration. The transparency pillar highlights the crucial role of maintaining the explainabilty of AI algorithms, while the fairness and justice pillar emphasizes on addressing biases in healthcare data and designing models that prioritize equitable medical training outcomes. The safety and wellbeing pillar however, emphasizes on the need to prioritize patient safety and wellbeing in AI model design whether it is for training or simulation purposes, and the accountability pillar calls for establishing clear lines of responsibility and liability for AI-derived decisions. Finally, the collaboration pillar emphasizes interdisciplinary collaboration among stakeholders, including physicians, data scientists, patients, and educators. The proposed framework thus provides a practical guide for designing and deploying AI in medicine generally, and in medical training specifically in a responsible and ethical manner.
Keywords: Human-Computer Interaction; XAI; artificial intelligence; digital health; human-AI interaction.
Copyright © 2023 Tahri Sqalli, Aslonov, Gafurov and Nurmatov.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Fairness of artificial intelligence in healthcare: review and recommendations.Jpn J Radiol. 2024 Jan;42(1):3-15. doi: 10.1007/s11604-023-01474-3. Epub 2023 Aug 4. Jpn J Radiol. 2024. PMID: 37540463 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Ethical challenges and evolving strategies in the integration of artificial intelligence into clinical practice.PLOS Digit Health. 2025 Apr 8;4(4):e0000810. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000810. eCollection 2025 Apr. PLOS Digit Health. 2025. PMID: 40198594 Free PMC article.
-
Unraveling the Ethical Enigma: Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare.Cureus. 2023 Aug 10;15(8):e43262. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43262. eCollection 2023 Aug. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 37692617 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Twelve tips for addressing ethical concerns in the implementation of artificial intelligence in medical education.Med Educ Online. 2024 Dec 31;29(1):2330250. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2024.2330250. Epub 2024 Apr 3. Med Educ Online. 2024. PMID: 38566608 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Establishing responsible use of AI guidelines: a comprehensive case study for healthcare institutions.NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Nov 30;7(1):348. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01300-8. NPJ Digit Med. 2024. PMID: 39616269 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Evaluating EHR-Integrated Digital Technologies for Medication-Related Outcomes and Health Equity in Hospitalised Adults: A Scoping Review.J Med Syst. 2024 Aug 23;48(1):79. doi: 10.1007/s10916-024-02097-5. J Med Syst. 2024. PMID: 39174723 Free PMC article.
-
Beyond the Screen: The Impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) on Patient Learning and the Patient-Physician Relationship.Cureus. 2025 Jan 2;17(1):e76825. doi: 10.7759/cureus.76825. eCollection 2025 Jan. Cureus. 2025. PMID: 39897260 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Advancements in artificial intelligence transforming medical education: a comprehensive overview.Med Educ Online. 2025 Dec;30(1):2542807. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2025.2542807. Epub 2025 Aug 12. Med Educ Online. 2025. PMID: 40798935 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Application of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Diagnosing Scaphoid Fractures: A Systematic Review.Cureus. 2023 Oct 26;15(10):e47732. doi: 10.7759/cureus.47732. eCollection 2023 Oct. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 38021992 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Eye tracking technology in medical practice: a perspective on its diverse applications.Front Med Technol. 2023 Nov 17;5:1253001. doi: 10.3389/fmedt.2023.1253001. eCollection 2023. Front Med Technol. 2023. PMID: 38045887 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Alahmadi A., Saleem M. (2022). Implementation of FCM approach: challenges before teachers and identification of gaps. Contemp. Educ. Technol. 14, ep394. 10.30935/cedtech/12581 - DOI
-
- Bennett C. L., Rosner D. K. (2019). “The promise of empathy,” in Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow: ACM; ).
-
- Ehsan U., Liao Q. V., Muller M., Riedl M. O., Weisz J. D. (2021). “Expanding explainability: towards social transparency in AI systems,” in Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama: ACM; ).
-
- Feigenbaum J., Jaggard A. D., Wright R. N. (2020). Accountability in computing: concepts and mechanisms. Found. Trends Privacy Sec. 2, 247–399. 10.1561/3300000002 - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous