Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May 16:6:1189914.
doi: 10.3389/frai.2023.1189914. eCollection 2023.

Humanizing AI in medical training: ethical framework for responsible design

Affiliations

Humanizing AI in medical training: ethical framework for responsible design

Mohammed Tahri Sqalli et al. Front Artif Intell. .

Abstract

The increasing use of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare has brought about numerous ethical considerations that push for reflection. Humanizing AI in medical training is crucial to ensure that the design and deployment of its algorithms align with ethical principles and promote equitable healthcare outcomes for both medical practitioners trainees and patients. This perspective article provides an ethical framework for responsibly designing AI systems in medical training, drawing on our own past research in the fields of electrocardiogram interpretation training and e-health wearable devices. The article proposes five pillars of responsible design: transparency, fairness and justice, safety and wellbeing, accountability, and collaboration. The transparency pillar highlights the crucial role of maintaining the explainabilty of AI algorithms, while the fairness and justice pillar emphasizes on addressing biases in healthcare data and designing models that prioritize equitable medical training outcomes. The safety and wellbeing pillar however, emphasizes on the need to prioritize patient safety and wellbeing in AI model design whether it is for training or simulation purposes, and the accountability pillar calls for establishing clear lines of responsibility and liability for AI-derived decisions. Finally, the collaboration pillar emphasizes interdisciplinary collaboration among stakeholders, including physicians, data scientists, patients, and educators. The proposed framework thus provides a practical guide for designing and deploying AI in medicine generally, and in medical training specifically in a responsible and ethical manner.

Keywords: Human-Computer Interaction; XAI; artificial intelligence; digital health; human-AI interaction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Ethical framework for responsibly designing medical training systems.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alahmadi A., Saleem M. (2022). Implementation of FCM approach: challenges before teachers and identification of gaps. Contemp. Educ. Technol. 14, ep394. 10.30935/cedtech/12581 - DOI
    1. Bennett C. L., Rosner D. K. (2019). “The promise of empathy,” in Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow: ACM; ).
    1. Chetwood A. S. A., Kwok K.-W., Sun L.-W., Mylonas G. P., Clark J., Darzi A., et al. . (2012). Collaborative eye tracking: a potential training tool in laparoscopic surgery. Surg. Endosc. 26, 2003–2009. 10.1007/s00464-011-2143-x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ehsan U., Liao Q. V., Muller M., Riedl M. O., Weisz J. D. (2021). “Expanding explainability: towards social transparency in AI systems,” in Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama: ACM; ).
    1. Feigenbaum J., Jaggard A. D., Wright R. N. (2020). Accountability in computing: concepts and mechanisms. Found. Trends Privacy Sec. 2, 247–399. 10.1561/3300000002 - DOI