Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2023 Jun;201(3):255-266.
doi: 10.1007/s00408-023-00621-x. Epub 2023 Jun 1.

Efficacy and Safety of Eliapixant in Refractory Chronic Cough: The Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Phase 2b PAGANINI Study

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Efficacy and Safety of Eliapixant in Refractory Chronic Cough: The Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Phase 2b PAGANINI Study

Peter V Dicpinigaitis et al. Lung. 2023 Jun.

Abstract

Introduction: The PAGANINI study evaluated the efficacy and safety of the selective P2X3 antagonist eliapixant in patients with refractory chronic cough (RCC).

Methods: PAGANINI was a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, multicenter, dose-finding, phase 2b study. Adults with RCC lasting ≥ 12 months and cough severity ≥ 40 mm on a visual analog scale at screening were enrolled. Participants were randomized 1:1:1:1 to twice-daily 25 mg, 75 mg, or 150 mg oral eliapixant or placebo for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in 24-h cough count after 12 weeks of intervention.

Results: Overall, 310 participants were randomized to twice-daily eliapixant 25 mg (n = 75), 75 mg (n = 78), 150 mg (n = 80), or placebo (n = 77). A statistically significant dose-response signal with eliapixant was detected for the primary endpoint (all dose-response models, adjusted p < 0.1; one-sided). Adverse events (AEs) were reported in 39 (51%) participants with placebo and 43-51 (57-65%) participants receiving eliapixant. The most common AE was dysgeusia, occurring in 1% (n = 1) of the placebo group and 1-16% (n = 1-13) of the eliapixant groups in a dose-related manner. One case of a moderate drug-induced liver injury occurred in a participant receiving 150 mg twice-daily eliapixant.

Conclusion: Eliapixant demonstrated efficacy and a favorable taste tolerability profile in RCC. However, a drug-induced liver injury contributed to intensified liver monitoring in clinical trials with eliapixant and discontinuation of the entire development program in all indications by Bayer AG.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04562155; registered September 18, 2020.

Keywords: Chronic cough; Eliapixant; P2X3 receptor antagonist; Phase 2b clinical trial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

PVD reports remuneration for consultancy from Bayer AG, Bellus Health, Chiesi, Merck, and Shionogi. AHM reports remuneration for consultancy from Bayer AG, Bellus Health, Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck, Pfizer, Procter & Gamble, and Shionogi, lecture fees from AstraZeneca and Boehringer Ingelheim, and grant support from Afferent Pharmaceuticals, Infirst, Merck, and Procter & Gamble. JAS reports research grants and remuneration for consultancy from Algernon, AstraZeneca, Axalbion, Bayer AG, Bellus Health, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Merck, Nocion Therapeutics, Shionogi, and Trevi, and non-financial support and royalties from Vitalograph paid to Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust that may be shared with the department in which JAS works. JAS is funded by the Manchester NIHR Biomedical Research Centre and an NIHR Senior Investigator Award. MRS reports research grants from Afferent Pharmaceuticals, Bayer AG, Bellus Health, Merck, NeRRe Therapeutics, and Shionogi, remuneration for lectures from Merck, and has served on advisory committees for Afferent Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Bayer AG, Bellus Health, Merck, NeRRe Therapeutics, Nocion Therapeutics, and Shionogi and on a Data and Safety Monitoring Board for Nocion Therapeutics. MV reports remuneration for consultancy in litigation relating to acid suppressive therapy, has served on an advisory committee for Bayer AG, Diversatek, Ironwood, ISOThrive, Medtronic, Phathom, and Sanofi, and holds a patent with Diversatek. LG reports a research grant from AstraZeneca, remuneration for lectures from AstraZeneca, Bayer AG, GlaxoSmithKline, MSD, Novartis, and Sanofi, and remuneration for consultancy from AstraZeneca, Bayer AG, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, MSD, Novartis, and Sanofi. AN reports research grants from Kyorin Pharmaceutical and Novartis and remuneration for lectures from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Kyorin Pharmaceutical, MSD, and Novartis. KG, UK, RS, and MW are employees of Bayer AG. PVP was an employee of Bayer AG at the time of the study and is now an employee of the Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson. LMG reports research grants from Bayer AG, Bellus Health, Chiesi, Merck, and Shionogi, remuneration for lectures from Bayer AG, Bellus Health, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, and Shionogi, remuneration for consultancy from Bayer AG, Bellus Health, Chiesi, Merck, NeRRe Therapeutics, Nocion Therapeutics, and Shionogi, and has served on advisory committees for Applied Clinical Intelligence, Bayer AG, Bellus Health, Chiesi, Merck, NeRRe Therapeutics, Nocion Therapeutics, and Shionogi and on a Data and Safety Monitoring Board for Bayer AG.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Participant disposition. Includes the 12-week treatment period and the 30-day safety follow-up. If a participant has more than one validity finding that excludes them from an analysis set, all the findings are displayed. All 34 participants (11%) who discontinued the treatment phase of the study entered the safety follow-up. A total of 294 participants (95%) completed the 30-day safety follow-up. COVID-19 corona virus disease 2019
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
(A) Change from baseline in 24-h cough count throughout study period and (B) the estimated dose–response Emax model for the change from baseline to Week 12 in log-transformed 24-h cough count with an 80% CI (per protocol set). In (B), circles indicate the estimated dose response in each dose group adjusted for baseline cough count and geographic region. The dotted horizontal reference line at − 0.44 represents the estimated dose response in the placebo group. The solid line indicates the estimated Emax dose–response model and the dashed lines indicate the 80% CI. CI confidence interval, Emax asymptotic maximum change from placebo effect
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
End-of-study assessment on taste disturbances (safety analysis seta)

References

    1. Song WJ, Chang YS, Faruqi S, Kim JY, Kang MG, Kim S, Jo EJ, Kim MH, Plevkova J, Park HW, Cho SH, Morice AH. The global epidemiology of chronic cough in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Respir J. 2015;45(5):1479–1481. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00218714. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Morice AH, Millqvist E, Bieksiene K, Birring SS, Dicpinigaitis P, Domingo Ribas C, Hilton Boon M, Kantar A, Lai K, McGarvey L, Rigau D, Satia I, Smith J, Song WJ, Tonia T, van den Berg JWK, van Manen MJG, Zacharasiewicz A. ERS guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of chronic cough in adults and children. Eur Respir J. 2020;55(1):1901136. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01136-2019. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Young EC, Smith JA. Quality of life in patients with chronic cough. Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2010;4(1):49–55. doi: 10.1177/1753465809358249. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Morice A, Dicpinigaitis P, McGarvey L, Birring SS. Chronic cough: new insights and future prospects. Eur Respir Rev. 2021;30(162):210127. doi: 10.1183/16000617.0127-2021. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hulme K, Deary V, Dogan S, Parker SM. Psychological profile of individuals presenting with chronic cough. ERJ Open Res. 2017;3(1):00099–02016. doi: 10.1183/23120541.00099-2016. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data