Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul 1;141(7):651-657.
doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2023.2062.

Bibliometric Analysis of Ophthalmic Journals

Jason J Nichols  1 , Philip B Morgan  2 , Lyndon W Jones  3 , Nathan Efron  4
Affiliations

Bibliometric Analysis of Ophthalmic Journals

Jason J Nichols et al. JAMA Ophthalmol. .

Abstract

Importance: The primary vehicle for reporting and testing advances in eye care is refereed ophthalmic journals, which can be characterized using targeted bibliometric analyses.

Objective: To identify all ophthalmic journals and evaluate citation metrics relating to articles, journals, authors, institutions, and countries published therein.

Design and setting: A bibliometric analysis was undertaken of all ophthalmic journals included in the Scopus database (Elsevier). The search was restricted to all article types published in ophthalmic journals in English from inception through November 18, 2022. After excluding general medical journals, journals published in a language other than English, and spurious titles unrelated to the ophthalmic field, the Scopus database was found to list 335 ophthalmic journal titles that have published 471 184 articles, constituting the data set for this analysis. The 20 most highly cited articles were identified. Rank-order lists by article count were assembled for journals, authors, institutions, and countries.

Main outcomes and measures: An h-index for ophthalmic journal articles was derived from citations and article counts for each constituent of each category.

Results: The h-index for ophthalmic journal articles was determined to be 494. The journal with the highest h-index was Ophthalmology (h-index, 297). The journal with the greatest number of articles was American Journal of Ophthalmology (38 441 articles). The most highly cited article was by Quigley and Broman, 2006 (5147 citations), concerning the epidemiology of glaucoma. The author with the highest h-index for ophthalmic journal articles was Ronald Klein, MD (h-index, 126), and the most prolific was Carol L. Shields, MD (1400 articles). Johns Hopkins University (h-index, 215) was the institution with the highest h-index for ophthalmic journal articles, and Harvard University was the most prolific (10 071 articles). The United States was the nation with the highest h-index for ophthalmic journal articles (h-index, 444) and was the most prolific (180 017 articles).

Conclusions and relevance: In this study, the most highly cited articles published in ophthalmic journals were revealed, as well as the leading journals, authors, institutions, and countries. While excluding ophthalmology articles in general medical journals, this investigation affords a means of identifying highly cited authors, institutions, and countries which individuals or institutions can use as a guide regarding contributions to the field.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Morgan reported grants from Johnson & Johnson Vision, CooperVision, Alcon, Menicon, and Visco Vision and personal fees from Johnson & Johnson Vision, CooperVision, Alcon, and Bausch & Lomb outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure.
Figure.. Number of Articles Published in Ophthalmic Journals Each Year Between 1920 and 2022
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Gusenbauer M. Search where you will find most: comparing the disciplinary coverage of 56 bibliographic databases. Scientometrics. 2022;127(5):2683-2745. doi:10.1007/s11192-022-04289-7 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. AlRyalat SAS, Malkawi LW, Momani SM. Comparing bibliometric analysis using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. J Vis Exp. 2019;152(152). doi:10.3791/58494 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Moral-Muñoz JA, Herrera-Viedma E, Santisteban-Espejo A, Cobo MJ. Software tools for conducting bibliometric analysis in science: an up-to-date review. Prof Inf. 2020;29:e290103. doi:10.3145/epi.2020.ene.03 - DOI
    1. Efron N, Morgan PB, Jones LW, Nichols JJ. Bibliometric analysis of the keratoconus literature. Clin Exp Optom. 2022;105(4):372-377. doi:10.1080/08164622.2021.1973866 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zhao L, Li J, Feng L, et al. . Depicting developing trend and core knowledge of primary open-angle glaucoma: a bibliometric and visualized analysis. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022;9:922527. doi:10.3389/fmed.2022.922527 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources