Measuring misophonia in youth: A psychometric evaluation of child and parent measures
- PMID: 37263358
- PMCID: PMC11165319
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.05.093
Measuring misophonia in youth: A psychometric evaluation of child and parent measures
Abstract
Background: Misophonia is characterized by intense emotional reactions to specific sounds or visual stimuli and typically onsets during childhood. An obstacle for research and clinical practice is that no comprehensively evaluated measures for pediatric misophonia exist.
Methods: In a sample of 102 youth meeting the proposed diagnostic criteria of misophonia, we evaluated the child and parent-proxy versions of the self-reported Misophonia Assessment Questionnaire (MAQ; assessing broad aspects of misophonia) and the child version of the Amsterdam Misophonia Scale (A-MISO-S; assessing misophonia severity). Confirmatory and exploratory factor analysis were used to examine factor structures of the measures. Further, child-parent agreement on the MAQ and associations between both measures and misophonia-related impairment, quality of life, and misophonia-related school interference were examined to evaluate aspects of convergent validity.
Results: For both youth- and parent-ratings, four MAQ factors emerged: pessimism, distress, interference, and non-recognition. A-MISO-S showed a unidimensional structure, but the item 'effort to resist' did not load significantly onto the unidimensional factor. Good child-parent agreement on the MAQ scales were found and both MAQ and A-MISO-S were moderately to strongly associated with misophonia-related impairment, quality of life (inverse association), and misophonia-related school interference.
Limitations: MAQ and A-MISO-S assess sensitivity to auditory but not visual stimuli, the sample size was modest, and repeated assessments were not conducted.
Conclusions: The combination of MAQ and A-MISO-S shows promise as a multidimensional assessment approach for pediatric misophonia. Future evaluations should include known-groups validity, screening performance, and sensitivity to change in symptom severity.
Keywords: A-MISO-S; Adolescents; Children; MAQ; Measures; Misophonia; Psychometric; Questionnaires.
Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest None
Figures
References
-
- Dibb B, Golding S, Dozier T, 2021. The development and validation of the Misophonia response scale. J. Psychosom. Res 149, 110587. - PubMed
-
- Dozier TH, 2015. Counterconditioning treatment for misophonia. Clin. Case Stud 14, 374–387.
-
- Endicott J, Nee J, Yang R, Wohlberg C, 2006. Pediatric quality of life enjoyment and satisfaction questionnaire (PQ-LES-Q): reliability and validity. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 45, 401–407. - PubMed
-
- Fava G, Tomba E, Sonino N, 2012. Clinimetrics: the science of clinical measurements. Int. J. Clin. Pract 66, 11–15. - PubMed
-
- Garcia BNB, Gray LS, Simons LE, Logan DE, 2017. Development of the parent responses to school functioning questionnaire. J. Pain 18, 1277–1286. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Supplementary concepts
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
