Accuracy assessment of dynamic navigation during implant placement: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies in the last 10 years
- PMID: 37263412
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104567
Accuracy assessment of dynamic navigation during implant placement: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies in the last 10 years
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the accuracy of dynamic computer-aided implant surgery (dCAIS) and compare it with static computer-aided implant surgery (sCAIS) and freehand implant placement (FH) in partially or fully edentulous patients.
Data: Studies that analyzed the accuracy of dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery in partially or fully edentulous patients.
Sources: This meta-analysis included studies published in English and Mandarin Chinese from January 2013 to February 2023 from MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), and CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure).
Study selection: Only clinical studies were included. Accuracy was the primary outcome. Seventeen studies met the inclusion criteria. A total of 2,025 implants were analyzed. Meta-regression was conducted to compare the six different navigation systems. GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) assessment was adopted as a collective grading of the evidence.
Conclusions: Dynamic navigation is a clinically reliable method for implant placement. Significantly lower angular deviation was observed for dCAIS compared to both sCAIS and FH, while significantly lower global platform and apex deviations were displayed between dCAIS and FH. Overall, dynamic navigation allowed for higher accuracy compared to both sCAIS and FH in a clinical setting; however, additional large sample RCT studies should be conducted, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) reported.
Clinical significance: This systematic review analyzed the accuracy of dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery in partially or fully edentulous patients compared with static navigation. The results demonstrated that dynamic navigation could decrease implant placement angular deviations.
Keywords: Computer-assisted surgery; Dental implants; Evidence-based dentistry; Image-guided surgery; Surgical navigation systems.
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Similar articles
-
Accuracy assessment of dynamic computer-aided implant placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clin Oral Investig. 2021 May;25(5):2479-2494. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-03833-8. Epub 2021 Feb 26. Clin Oral Investig. 2021. PMID: 33635397
-
Accuracy Comparison between Robot-Assisted Dental Implant Placement and Static/Dynamic Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of In Vitro Studies.Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Dec 20;60(1):11. doi: 10.3390/medicina60010011. Medicina (Kaunas). 2023. PMID: 38276045 Free PMC article.
-
Accuracy and safety of dynamic navigation vs. freehand approach in indirect sinus lift and immediate implant placement: A split mouth clinical study.J Dent. 2025 Sep;160:105866. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105866. Epub 2025 May 29. J Dent. 2025. PMID: 40449828
-
Accuracy in dental implant placement: A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing computer-assisted (static, dynamic, robotics) and noncomputer-assisted (freehand, conventional guide) approaches.J Prosthet Dent. 2025 Jul;134(1):91.e1-91.e25. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2025.03.038. Epub 2025 Apr 11. J Prosthet Dent. 2025. PMID: 40221370
-
Comparison of accuracy in freehand versus computer-assisted (dynamic and static) dental implant placement: A systematic review and meta-analysis.J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2025 Jan 1;25(1):22-29. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_369_24. Epub 2025 Jan 3. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2025. PMID: 40654119 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Beyond Accuracy: Clinical Outcomes of Computer Assisted Implant Surgery.Clin Exp Dent Res. 2025 Jun;11(3):e70129. doi: 10.1002/cre2.70129. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2025. PMID: 40375737 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Accuracy of dynamic navigation compared to static surgical guides and the freehand approach in implant placement: a prospective clinical study.Head Face Med. 2024 May 14;20(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s13005-024-00433-1. Head Face Med. 2024. PMID: 38745297 Free PMC article.
-
Influence of dental implant clinical experience on the accuracy of robot-assisted immediate implant placement: an in vitro study.Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Sep 5;28(9):515. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05890-1. Clin Oral Investig. 2024. PMID: 39235538
-
Accuracy and operation procedure of robotic computer-aided implant surgery.Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 2;15(1):307. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-83997-x. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 39748004 Free PMC article.
-
Precision implant placement: A novel approach using dynamic navigation system-guided alveolar ridge splitting.J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2025 Apr 1;25(2):179-184. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_372_24. Epub 2025 Apr 11. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2025. PMID: 40213890 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous