Immunochemotherapy for life-threatening haematological malignancies in pregnancy: a systematic review of the literature and cross-sectional analysis of clinical trial eligibility
- PMID: 37263722
- DOI: 10.1016/S2352-3026(23)00059-5
Immunochemotherapy for life-threatening haematological malignancies in pregnancy: a systematic review of the literature and cross-sectional analysis of clinical trial eligibility
Abstract
The management of potentially life-threatening malignancies in pregnancy is complicated by a lack of robust safety and efficacy evidence. This data shortage stems from a historical exclusion of women of childbearing potential from prospective clinical trials due to concerns around potential teratogenicity and toxicity of investigational agents. We conducted a systematic review of published data on immunochemotherapeutic treatment of life-threatening haematological malignancies in pregnancy between 2010 and 2022, and the maternal and neonatal outcomes. We then performed a cross-sectional observational study of clinical trial protocols on ClinicalTrials.gov, between 2016 and 2022, recruiting women of childbearing potential with potentially life-threatening haematological malignancies, collecting trial demographic data, and documenting whether pregnant or lactating women were explicitly excluded, along with the type and duration of contraception required for women of childbearing potential. We included 17 studies for analysis in our systematic review. A total of 595 women were treated with immunochemotherapy during pregnancy, with a median age of 29 years (range 14-48). Of these, 81 women (14%) were treated in the first trimester, and 514 (86%) were treated in the second and third trimesters collectively. In total, 68 trials for acute myeloid leukaemia, acute lymphocytic leukaemia, high-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and Hodgkin lymphoma (40%, 26%, 21%, and 13%, respectively) were included in our ClinicalTrials.gov analysis. Most protocols (66 [97%]) explicitly excluded pregnant women, with 40 (69%) not providing a rationale for exclusion. The potential harm to the fetus from anti-cancer therapy has historically been given greater moral precedence than a pregnant woman's autonomy. This pattern is reflected in the lack of rigorous evidence for immunochemotherapy in pregnancy and a universal exclusion of pregnant and lactating women from clinical trial protocols in this study. Nonetheless, the administration of systemic chemotherapy in the second and third trimesters was not associated with an increased rate of congenital malformations or perinatal mortality in our systematic review cohort, with maternal outcomes broadly comparable to those of the non-pregnant population.
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of interests We declare no competing interests.
Comment in
-
Haematological malignancies in pregnancy: time for accurate incidence data.Lancet Haematol. 2023 Sep;10(9):e705. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(23)00238-7. Lancet Haematol. 2023. PMID: 37652595 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Restrictive versus liberal red blood cell transfusion strategies for people with haematological malignancies treated with intensive chemotherapy or radiotherapy, or both, with or without haematopoietic stem cell support.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 27;1(1):CD011305. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011305.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 23;5:CD011305. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011305.pub3. PMID: 28128441 Free PMC article. Updated.
-
Comparison of first-line chemotherapy including escalated BEACOPP versus chemotherapy including ABVD for people with early unfavourable or advanced stage Hodgkin lymphoma.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 25;5(5):CD007941. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007941.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28541603 Free PMC article.
-
Optimisation of chemotherapy and radiotherapy for untreated Hodgkin lymphoma patients with respect to second malignant neoplasms, overall and progression-free survival: individual participant data analysis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 13;9(9):CD008814. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008814.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28901021 Free PMC article.
-
Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus multiple daily injections of insulin for pregnant women with diabetes.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 7;2016(6):CD005542. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005542.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. PMID: 27272351 Free PMC article.
-
Different intensities of glycaemic control for women with gestational diabetes mellitus.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 7;4(4):CD011624. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011624.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Oct 10;10:CD011624. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011624.pub3. PMID: 27055233 Free PMC article. Updated.
Cited by
-
Broadening the horizon: potential applications of CAR-T cells beyond current indications.Front Immunol. 2023 Nov 27;14:1285406. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1285406. eCollection 2023. Front Immunol. 2023. PMID: 38090582 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Haematological malignancies during pregnancy: a systematic review of necessary services in the Australian context.Intern Med J. 2025 Mar;55(3):393-406. doi: 10.1111/imj.16651. Epub 2025 Mar 5. Intern Med J. 2025. PMID: 40042130 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical