Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Aug;32(8):2889-2895.
doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07749-7. Epub 2023 Jun 1.

Incidence and management of dural tears in full-endoscopic unilateral laminotomies for bilateral lumbar decompression

Affiliations

Incidence and management of dural tears in full-endoscopic unilateral laminotomies for bilateral lumbar decompression

Madeline E Greil et al. Eur Spine J. 2023 Aug.

Abstract

Purpose: To report incidence of dural lacerations in lumbar endoscopic unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (LE-ULBD) and to describe patient outcomes following a novel full-endoscopic bimanual durotomy repair.

Methods: Retrospective review of prospectively collected database including 5.5 years of single surgeon experience with LE-ULBD. Patients with no durotomy were compared with patients who experienced intraoperative durotomy, including demographics, ASA score, prior surgery, number of levels treated, procedure time, hospital length of stay (LOS), visual analogue scale, perioperative complications, revision surgeries, use of analgesics, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).

Results: In total, 13/174 patients (7.5%) undergoing LE-ULBD experienced intraoperative durotomy. No significant differences in demographic, clinical or operative variables were identified between the 2 groups. Sustaining a durotomy increased LOS (p = 0.0019); no differences in perioperative complications or rate of revision surgery were identified. There was no difference in minimally clinically important difference for ODI between groups (65.6% for no durotomy versus 55.6% for durotomy, p = 0.54).

Conclusion: In this cohort, sustaining a durotomy increased LOS but, with accompanying intraoperative repair, did not significantly affect rate of complications, revision surgery or functional outcomes. Our method of bimanual endoscopic dural repair provides an effective approach for repair of dural lacerations in interlaminar ULBD cases.

Keywords: Complications; Dural tear; Durotomy; Full-endoscopic spine surgery; Lumbar stenosis; Surgical technique; Unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Komp M, Hahn P, Oezdemir S et al (2015) Bilateral spinal decompression of lumbar central stenosis with the full-endoscopic interlaminar versus microsurgical laminotomy technique: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Pain Phys 18:61–70 - DOI
    1. Ruetten S, Komp M, Merk H, Godolias G (2009) Surgical treatment for lumbar lateral recess stenosis with the full-endoscopic interlaminar approach versus conventional microsurgical technique: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. J Neurosurg Spine 10:476–485. https://doi.org/10.3171/2008.7.17634 - DOI - PubMed
    1. McGrath LB, White-Dzuro GA, Hofstetter CP (2019) Comparison of clinical outcomes following minimally invasive or lumbar endoscopic unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression. J Neurosurg Spine 30:491–499. https://doi.org/10.3171/2018.9.SPINE18689 - DOI
    1. Telfeian AE, Shen J, Ali R, Oyelese A, Fridley J, Gokaslan ZL (2020) Incidence and implications of incidental durotomy in transforaminal endoscopic spine surgery: case series. World Neurosurg 134:e951–e955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.11.045 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kim HS, Raorane HD, Wu PH, Heo DW, Sharma SB, Jang I-T (2020) Incidental durotomy during endoscopic stenosis lumbar decompression: incidence, classification, and proposed management strategies. World Neurosurg 139:e13–e22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.01.242 - DOI - PubMed