Predictors of postoperative epidural hematomas after custom-made porous hydroxyapatite cranioplasty: a single-center experience of 194 consecutive cases
- PMID: 37264174
- DOI: 10.1007/s10143-023-02039-8
Predictors of postoperative epidural hematomas after custom-made porous hydroxyapatite cranioplasty: a single-center experience of 194 consecutive cases
Abstract
Cranioplasty is important for improving cosmesis and functional recovery after decompressive craniectomy. We assessed the incidence and predictors of post-cranioplasty epidural hematomas requiring surgical evacuation. A single-institution, retrospective study enrolled 194 consecutive patients who underwent a cranioplasty using custom-made hydroxyapatite between February 2008 and April 2022. Variables associated with postoperative epidural hematoma requiring surgical evacuation at the p < 0.1 level in unadjusted analysis were entered into multivariable analyses. Nine patients (4.6%) experienced postoperative epidural hematomas requiring evacuation, with time interval between craniectomy and cranioplasty <6 months (adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 20.75, p = 0.047), cranioplasty-to-bone shift > half of the bone thickness (aOR, 17.53, p = 0.008), >10 mm difference between pre-cranioplasty and post-cranioplasty midline brain shift contralateral to the cranioplasty (aOR, 17.26, p < 0.001), and non-resorbable duraplasty (aOR, 17.43, p = 0.011) identified as independent predictors. Seventeen patients (8.8%) experienced post-cranioplasty hydrocephalus requiring shunt placement. Twenty-six patients (13.4%) experienced postoperative infection. Sixteen patients (8.2%) had postoperative epileptic seizures. The identification of independent predictors of post-cranioplasty epidural hematomas requiring surgical evacuation will help identify at-risk patients, guide prophylactic care, and reduce morbidity of this common and important procedure.
Keywords: Cranioplasty complications; Cranioplasty morbidity; Custom-made porous hydroxyapatite device; Hematoma; Reoperation.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Agner C, Dujovny M, Gaviria M (2002) Neurocognitive assessment before and after cranioplasty. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 144:1033–1040. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-002-0996-4 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Honeybul S, Janzen C, Kruger K, Ho KM (2013) The impact of cranioplasty on neurological function. Br J Neurosurg 27:636–641. https://doi.org/10.3109/02688697.2013.817532 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Parichay PJ, Khanapure K, Joshi KC, Aniruddha TJ, Sandhya M, Hegde AS (2017) Clinical and radiological assessment of cerebral hemodynamics after cranioplasty for decompressive craniectomy - a clinical study. J Clin Neurosci Off J Neurosurg Soc Australas 42:97–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2017.04.005 - DOI
-
- Segal DH, Oppenheim JS, Murovic JA (1994) Neurological recovery after cranioplasty. Neurosurgery 34:729–731; discussion 731. https://doi.org/10.1227/00006123-199404000-00024 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Song J, Liu M, Mo X, Du H, Huang H, Xu GZ (2014) Beneficial impact of early cranioplasty in patients with decompressive craniectomy: evidence from transcranial Doppler ultrasonography. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 156:193–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-013-1908-5 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous