Effects of personal protective equipment on cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality and outcomes: A systematic review
- PMID: 37265711
- PMCID: PMC10230254
- DOI: 10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100398
Effects of personal protective equipment on cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality and outcomes: A systematic review
Abstract
Background: The impact of wearing personal protective equipment (PPE) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) on CPR quality and patient outcomes is unclear. This systematic review aimed to examine whether wearing PPE during resuscitation affects patient outcomes, CPR quality and rescuer fatigue.
Methods: In this review registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022347746), we searched Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane library between 2000 and 2022. The inclusion criteria were studies: in actual or simulated cardiac arrest; comparing PPE with no PPE; and randomised controlled trials and observational studies with a English abstract. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane's Risk of Bias-2 and ROBINS-I tools and outcomes assessed with GRADE. We conducted a meta-analysis according to the study design. Quantitative data synthesis was done using a random-effect model incorporating the potential heterogeneity.
Results: A total of 17 simulation-based studies and 1 clinical study were included. All outcomes were judged to be very low certainty of evidence, subject to high risk of bias. The clinical study showed no difference in survival comparing enhanced and conventional PPE. Meta-analysis of 11 RCTs and 6 observational studies found no difference in CPR quality in rescuers wearing PPE compared with no PPE. Pooled rescuer fatigue was significantly worse in the PPE group (mean difference, 2.7 VAS score out of 10; 95% CI, 1.4-4.0).
Conclusions: PPE was not associated with reduced CPR quality or lower cardiac arrest survival. Rescuers wearing PPE may report more fatigue. This finding was mainly derived from simulation studies, additional clinical studies are needed.
Keywords: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; Chest compression; Personal protective equipment.
© 2023 The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. JB is an Associate Editor of Resuscitation Plus.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Impact of personal protective equipment on the effectiveness of chest compression - A systematic review and meta-analysis.Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Jan;39:190-196. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.09.058. Epub 2020 Oct 1. Am J Emerg Med. 2021. PMID: 33046289 Free PMC article.
-
Analysis of Physiological Response during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation with Personal Protective Equipment: A Randomized Crossover Study.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 2;18(13):7093. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18137093. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34281042 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The effect of personal protective equipment on cardiac compression quality.Afr J Emerg Med. 2021 Dec;11(4):385-389. doi: 10.1016/j.afjem.2021.07.004. Epub 2021 Oct 14. Afr J Emerg Med. 2021. PMID: 34703728 Free PMC article.
-
Influence of Personal Protective Equipment on the Quality of Chest Compressions: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Nov 26;8:733724. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.733724. eCollection 2021. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021. PMID: 34901055 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of Personal Protective Equipment on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Rescuer Safety.Emerg Med Int. 2023 Nov 30;2023:9697442. doi: 10.1155/2023/9697442. eCollection 2023. Emerg Med Int. 2023. PMID: 38077106 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
The quality of CPR delivered by EMS personnel wearing enhanced personal protective equipment during the COVID-19 pandemic: a retrospective cohort study from Perth, Australia.Resusc Plus. 2025 Aug 14;26:101062. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2025.101062. eCollection 2025 Nov. Resusc Plus. 2025. PMID: 40919523 Free PMC article.
-
2023 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations: Summary From the Basic Life Support; Advanced Life Support; Pediatric Life Support; Neonatal Life Support; Education, Implementation, and Teams; and First Aid Task Forces.Circulation. 2023 Dec 12;148(24):e187-e280. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001179. Epub 2023 Nov 9. Circulation. 2023. PMID: 37942682 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Enhancing Safety and Quality of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation During Coronavirus Pandemic.J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 11;14(12):4145. doi: 10.3390/jcm14124145. J Clin Med. 2025. PMID: 40565889 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Use of personal protective equipment and cognitive load during cardiopulmonary resuscitation - A randomized cross-over simulation-based study.Resusc Plus. 2025 Mar 20;23:100936. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2025.100936. eCollection 2025 May. Resusc Plus. 2025. PMID: 40230366 Free PMC article.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources