Management of eosinophil-associated inflammatory diseases: the importance of a multidisciplinary approach
- PMID: 37266434
- PMCID: PMC10229838
- DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1192284
Management of eosinophil-associated inflammatory diseases: the importance of a multidisciplinary approach
Abstract
Elevated eosinophil counts in blood and tissue are a feature of many pathological processes. Eosinophils can migrate and accumulate in a wide variety of tissues and, by infiltrating a target organ, can mediate the development of several inflammatory diseases. The normalization of eosinophilia is a common biomarker of a treatable trait and can also be used as a prognostic and predictive biomarker since it implies a reduction in type 2 inflammation that contributes to disease pathogenesis. Biological therapies targeting this cell type and its proinflammatory mediators have been shown to be effective in the management of a number of eosinophilic diseases, and for this reason they constitute a potential common strategy in the treatment of patients with various multimorbidities that present with type 2 inflammation. Various biological options are available that could be used to simultaneously treat multiple target organs with a single drug, bearing in mind the need to offer personalized treatments under the umbrella of precision medicine in all patients with eosinophil-associated diseases (EADs). In addition to reviewing these issues, we also discuss a series of perspectives addressing the management of EAD patients from a multidisciplinary approach, with the collaboration of health professionals from different specialties who manage the different multimorbidities that frequently occur in these patients. We examine the basic principles of care that this multidisciplinary approach must cover and present a multidisciplinary expert opinion regarding the ideal management of patients with EADs, from diagnosis to therapeutic approach and follow-up.
Keywords: eosinophil; eosinophil-associated disease; eosinophilic inflammation; expert opinion; multidisciplinary management.
Copyright © 2023 Quirce, Cosío, España, Blanco, Mullol, Santander and del Pozo.
Conflict of interest statement
Author SQ has received advisor’s and speaker’s honoraria from ALK, Allergy Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, LETI Pharma, Novartis, Chiesi, Mundipharma, Teva, and Sanofi. Author BC has received advisor’s and speaker’s honoraria from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Chiesi, Menarini, Novartis, Teva, and Sanofi. Author RB has received advisor’s and speaker’s honoraria from AbbVie, Lilly, Pfizer, Roche, BMS, Janssen and MSD, and research funding from AbbVie, MSD, Lilly and Roche. Author JM has received advisor’s, consultant’s and speaker’s honoraria, and research funding, from AstraZeneca, Genentech-Roche, GSK, LETI, Menarini, MSD, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, NOUCOR/Uriach Group, Novartis, OPTINOSE, Proctor & Gamble, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Sanofi-Genzyme, UCB Pharma, and Viatris/MEDA Pharma. Author CS has received consultant’s and trainer’s honoraria from Laborie/MMS, Medtronic Covidien AG, Menarini Consumer Healthcare, Doctaforum Medical Marketing S. L., ISOMED PHARMA S. L. and AstraZeneca and has received research funding from AstraZeneca, EsoCap Biotech, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Celldex Therapeutics, Adare Pharmaceuticals Inc., and Dr. Falk Pharma GmbH. Author VP has received advisor’s and speaker´s honoraria, and research funding, from AstraZeneca and GlaxoSmithKline. The remaining author declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures


References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical