Ancillary Treatment Referrals and Visits After Breast Cancer Surgery in a Sociodemographically Diverse Population
- PMID: 37266804
- DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13431-5
Ancillary Treatment Referrals and Visits After Breast Cancer Surgery in a Sociodemographically Diverse Population
Abstract
Background: Ancillary therapies with rehabilitative, palliative, and survivorship specialists mitigate adverse effects of breast cancer surgery. Existing data suggest that patients from disadvantaged backgrounds may be less likely to receive these services. This study aimed to assess variations in ancillary provider referrals and patient visits at a high-volume urban cancer center.
Methods: Electronic health records of breast cancer surgical patients at the Yale-New Haven Health System between 2010 and 2017 were reviewed. The primary end points were postoperative referral to ancillary service providers and patient use of ancillary services (defined as attending ≥ 1 consultation). Associations between end points and demographic/disease variables were identified in uni- and multivariable logistic regression analyses.
Results: The study identified 5496 patients: 2288 patients (41.6%) referred to ancillary services and 1572 patients (28.6%) who attended one or more consultations. Referrals were highest among the patients with Hispanic (57.5%) or black (54.9%) ancestry, no health insurance (57.6%), lowest percentage of high school degrees for the zip code area (50.5%), and poorest median income bracket (50.7%). Associations remained significant in the multivariable analysis (p < 0.05). Minority race remained associated with referrals in analyses of each ancillary service individually. Visits to ancillary specialists were greatest among the patients with private insurance (70.7%), highest percentage of high school degrees (72.8%), highest median household income (72.2%), and Hispanic ethnicity (73.5%). Highest median household income (odds ratio [OR] 1.45; p = 0.02) and Hispanic ethnicity (OR, 1.50; p = 0.05) remained associated in the multivariable analysis.
Conclusions: In a well-resourced health system serving a demographically diverse population, traditional markers of poor health care access were associated with referral for ancillary treatment after breast cancer surgery but not with utilization of ancillary treatment. Health care access remains a critical barrier to adjunctive therapies that target postoperative morbidity and elevate quality of life.
© 2023. Society of Surgical Oncology.
Comment in
- 
  
  ASO Author Reflections: Ancillary Treatment After Breast Cancer Surgery: Who are We Missing?Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Sep;30(9):5649-5650. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-13507-2. Epub 2023 May 13. Ann Surg Oncol. 2023. PMID: 37179270 No abstract available.
References
- 
    - Schmitz KH, Stout NL, Andrews K, et al. Prospective evaluation of physical rehabilitation needs in breast cancer survivors: a call to action. Cancer. 2012;118(8 Suppl):2187–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.27471 . - DOI - PubMed
 
- 
    - Partridge AH, Winer EP. Long-term complications of adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer. Breast Dis. 2004;21:55–64. https://doi.org/10.3233/bd-2004-21108 . - DOI - PubMed
 
- 
    - Heller DR, Killelea BK, Sanft T. Prevention is key: importance of early recognition and referral in combating breast cancer-related lymphedema. J Oncol Pract. 2019;15(5):263–4. https://doi.org/10.1200/JOP.19.00148 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
 
- 
    - American College of Surgeons. Optimal Resources for Cancer Care 2020 Standards. Chicago, IL, 2019.
 
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
- Full Text Sources
- Medical
 
        