Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2023 Jun 13;329(22):1924-1933.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.7843.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants vs Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin and Recurrent VTE in Patients With Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Collaborators, Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Direct Oral Anticoagulants vs Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin and Recurrent VTE in Patients With Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Deborah Schrag et al. JAMA. .

Abstract

Importance: In patients with cancer who have venous thromboembolism (VTE) events, long-term anticoagulation with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is recommended to prevent recurrent VTE. The effectiveness of a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) compared with LMWH for preventing recurrent VTE in patients with cancer is uncertain.

Objective: To evaluate DOACs, compared with LMWH, for preventing recurrent VTE and for rates of bleeding in patients with cancer following an initial VTE event.

Design, setting, and participants: Unblinded, comparative effectiveness, noninferiority randomized clinical trial conducted at 67 oncology practices in the US that enrolled 671 patients with cancer (any invasive solid tumor, lymphoma, multiple myeloma, or chronic lymphocytic leukemia) who had a new clinical or radiological diagnosis of VTE. Enrollment occurred from December 2016 to April 2020. Final follow-up was in November 2020.

Intervention: Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either a DOAC (n = 335) or LMWH (n = 336) and were followed up for 6 months or until death. Physicians and patients selected any DOAC or any LMWH (or fondaparinux) and physicians selected drug doses.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was the recurrent VTE rate at 6 months. Noninferiority of anticoagulation with a DOAC vs LMWH was defined by the upper limit of the 1-sided 95% CI for the difference of a DOAC relative to LMWH of less than 3% in the randomized cohort that received at least 1 dose of assigned treatment. The 6 prespecified secondary outcomes included major bleeding, which was assessed using a 2.5% noninferiority margin.

Results: Between December 2016 and April 2020, 671 participants were randomized and 638 (95%) completed the trial (median age, 64 years; 353 women [55%]). Among those randomized to a DOAC, 330 received at least 1 dose. Among those randomized to LMWH, 308 received at least 1 dose. Rates of recurrent VTE were 6.1% in the DOAC group and 8.8% in the LMWH group (difference, -2.7%; 1-sided 95% CI, -100% to 0.7%) consistent with the prespecified noninferiority criterion. Of 6 prespecified secondary outcomes, none were statistically significant. Major bleeding occurred in 5.2% of participants in the DOAC group and 5.6% in the LMWH group (difference, -0.4%; 1-sided 95% CI, -100% to 2.5%) and did not meet the noninferiority criterion. Severe adverse events occurred in 33.8% of participants in the DOAC group and 35.1% in the LMWH group. The most common serious adverse events were anemia and death.

Conclusions and relevance: Among adults with cancer and VTE, DOACs were noninferior to LMWH for preventing recurrent VTE over 6-month follow-up. These findings support use of a DOAC to prevent recurrent VTE in patients with cancer.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02744092.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Schrag reported receipt of nonfinancial support from Grail and Genentech/Roche and personal fees from Pfizer. Dr Rosovsky reported receipt of grants from Bristol Myers Squibb and Janssen to her institution and personal fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Abbott, Inari, Dova, and Penumbra. Dr Sanfilippo reported receipt of grants from the American Cancer Society and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; personal fees for expert case review from Covington & Burling LLP and Quinn Johnston; personal fees from Health Services Advisory Group; and research funds paid to her organization from Astellas Pharma and AstraZeneca. Dr Holmes reported receipt of grants from the National Institutes of Health. Dr Weiss reported a sponsored institutional research agreement with Myriad Laboratories. Dr Connors reported receipt of personal fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Anthos, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Werfern, Alnylam, Regeneron, and Abbott and research funding to her institution from CSL Behring. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Participant Flow in a Trial of Anticoagulation for Venous Thromboembolism in Adults With Cancer
Oncologists in the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology research network screened their ambulatory patients for adults with a new diagnosis of venous thromboembolism and either (1) an advanced solid tumor, lymphoma, multiple myeloma, or chronic lymphocytic leukemia or (2) an early-stage cancer of one of these same types diagnosed within 12 months of enrollment. Screening logs were not mandatory, so the exact number of screened patients was not captured. aSee eFigure 1 in Supplement 2 for participant flow in the preference cohort. bPermuted block randomization with varying block sizes was used. No stratification factors were considered at randomization. cOf those who did not receive their randomized treatment, 2 received enoxaparin, 1 received fondaparinux, and 2 did not receive any treatment. dPatients randomized to receive low-molecular-weight heparin could transition to warfarin with a target international normalized ratio of 2 to 3. eOf those who did not receive their randomized treatment, 12 received apixaban, 6 received rivaroxaban, and 10 did not receive any treatment.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Cumulative Incidence Rates of Outcomes
Cumulative incidence rates are shown for the as-treated population for (A) the first occurrence of the primary efficacy outcome of recurrent nonfatal venous thromboembolism (VTE), (B) the first occurrence of major bleeding, and (C) death. The median lengths of observation time are 180 (IQR, 159-180), 180 (IQR, 173.5-180), and 180 (IQR, 180-180) days, respectively.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Blom JW, Doggen CJM, Osanto S, Rosendaal FR. Malignancies, prothrombotic mutations, and the risk of venous thrombosis. JAMA. 2005;293(6):715-722. doi:10.1001/jama.293.6.715 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Castellucci LA, Cameron C, Le Gal G, et al. . Clinical and safety outcomes associated with treatment of acute venous thromboembolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2014;312(11):1122-1135. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.10538 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Silverstein MD, Heit JA, Mohr DN, Petterson TM, O’Fallon WM, Melton LJ III. Trends in the incidence of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a 25-year population-based study. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158(6):585-593. doi:10.1001/archinte.158.6.585 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Streiff MB, Milentijevic D, McCrae K, et al. . Effectiveness and safety of anticoagulants for the treatment of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer. Am J Hematol. 2018;93(5):664-671. doi:10.1002/ajh.25059 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Key NS, Khorana AA, Kuderer NM, et al. . Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and treatment in patients with cancer: ASCO clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(5):496-520. doi:10.1200/JCO.19.01461 - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

Associated data