Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1986 Jul;163(1):60-4.

Classification and management of postsurgical anal stenosis

  • PMID: 3726727

Classification and management of postsurgical anal stenosis

J W Milsom et al. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1986 Jul.

Abstract

Postoperative anal stenosis is a serious complication of anal operations. To date, ideal management of this problem has not been well defined. We reviewed the experience with this entity in 212 patients admitted over a five year period to a hospital specializing in colonic and rectal diseases. Etiology of the stenosis was secondary to hemorrhoid operations in 186 patients (87.7 per cent), anorectal surgical procedures associated with Crohn's disease in seven (3.3 per cent) and multiple other causes in the remaining 19 (9.0 per cent). A treatment plan based upon the cause, severity and level of stenosis of the anal canal (lower, middle and upper part of the canal) is proposed. Anal stenosis associated with Crohn's disease was treated with dilation with the patient under anesthesia with good results in six of seven patients. Severe lower anal canal stenosis was best treated by V-Y anoplasty (18 of 20 patients [90 per cent] with good results), although a simple sphincterotomy or multiple anal sphincterotomies achieved a good result in 75 of 111 patients (67 per cent). The middle, upper and entire anal canal stenoses were treated effectively by single or multiple internal anal sphincterotomies (34 of 42 patients [83 per cent] with good results), although advancement flap anoplasty procedures (simple advancement flap and V-Y anoplasty) worked well when indicated (nine of ten patients with good results). We advocate simple or multiple internal anal sphincterotomies for mild to moderate low anal stenoses, V-Y anoplasty for severe low anal stenoses and initial simple or multiple anal sphincterotomies through the stenotic area for middle, high or entire anal canal stenoses. Surgical judgement will dictate when lack of anoderm mandates advancement flap anoplasty with the sphincterotomy for the higher stenoses.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by