Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Nov;19(8):1321-1329.
doi: 10.1177/15589447231174480. Epub 2023 Jun 3.

Risk Factors for Secondary Revision After Finger Amputations

Affiliations

Risk Factors for Secondary Revision After Finger Amputations

Nikhil Adapa et al. Hand (N Y). 2024 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Digit amputations are relatively simple and are often performed in the setting of trauma or infection. However, it is not uncommon for digit amputations to undergo secondary revision due to complications or patient dissatisfaction. Identifying factors associated with secondary revision may alter treatment strategy. We hypothesize that the secondary revision rate is affected by digit, initial level of amputation, and comorbidities.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients undergoing digit amputations in operating rooms at our institution from 2011 to 2017. Secondary revision amputations were defined as a separate return to the operating room following initial surgical amputation, excluding emergency room amputations. Patient demographics, comorbidities, level of amputation, and complications were collected.

Results: In all, 278 patients were included with a total of 386 digit amputations and mean follow-up of 2.6 months. Three hundred twenty-six primary digit amputations were performed in 236 patients (group A). Sixty digits were secondarily revised in 42 patients (group B). The secondary revision rate was 17.8% for patients and 15.5% for digits. Patients with heart disease and diabetes mellitus were associated with secondary revision, with wound complications being the leading indication overall (73.8%). Medicare covered 52.4% of patients in group B versus 30.1% in group A (P = .005).

Conclusion: Risk factors for secondary revision include Medicare insurance, comorbidities, previous digit amputations, and initial amputation of either the index finger or the distal phalanx. These data may serve as a prediction model to aid surgical decision-making by identifying patients at risk of secondary revision amputation.

Keywords: amputation; anatomy; diagnosis; digits; hand; thumb; trauma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Harris AP, Goodman AD, Gil JA, et al.. Incidence, timing, and risk factors for secondary revision after primary revision of traumatic digit amputations. J Hand Surg Am. 2018;43(11):1040.e1. - PubMed
    1. Yuan F, McGlinn EP, Giladi AM, et al.. A systematic review of outcomes after revision amputation for treatment of traumatic finger amputation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;136(1):99-113. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Conn JM, Annest JL, Ryan GW, et al.. Non–work-related finger amputations in the United States, 2001-2002. Ann Emerg Med. 2005;45(6):630-635. - PubMed
    1. McCall BP, Horwitz IB. An assessment and quantification of the rates, costs, and risk factors of occupational amputations: analysis of Kentucky workers’ compensation claims, 1994–2003. Am J Ind Med. 2006;49(12):1031-1038. - PubMed
    1. Boyle D, Parker D, Larson C, et al.. Nature, incidence, and cause of work-related amputations in Minnesota. Am J Ind Med. 2000;37(5):542-550. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources