Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Dec;69(4-6):203-212.
doi: 10.1007/s00294-023-01272-4. Epub 2023 Jun 3.

Yeast of Eden: microbial resistance to glyphosate from a yeast perspective

Affiliations
Review

Yeast of Eden: microbial resistance to glyphosate from a yeast perspective

Dionysios Patriarcheas et al. Curr Genet. 2023 Dec.

Abstract

First marketed as RoundUp, glyphosate is history's most popular herbicide because of its low acute toxicity to metazoans and broad-spectrum effectiveness across plant species. The development of glyphosate-resistant crops has led to increased glyphosate use and consequences from the use of glyphosate-based herbicides (GBH). Glyphosate has entered the food supply, spurred glyphosate-resistant weeds, and exposed non-target organisms to glyphosate. Glyphosate targets EPSPS/AroA/Aro1 (orthologs across plants, bacteria, and fungi), the rate-limiting step in the production of aromatic amino acids from the shikimate pathway. Metazoans lacking this pathway are spared from acute toxicity and acquire their aromatic amino acids from their diet. However, glyphosate resistance is increasing in non-target organisms. Mutations and natural genetic variation discovered in Saccharomyces cerevisiae illustrate similar types of glyphosate resistance mechanisms in fungi, plants, and bacteria, in addition to known resistance mechanisms such as mutations in Aro1 that block glyphosate binding (target-site resistance (TSR)) and mutations in efflux drug transporters non-target-site resistance (NTSR). Recently, genetic variation and mutations in an amino transporter affecting glyphosate resistance have uncovered potential off-target effects of glyphosate in fungi and bacteria. While glyphosate is a glycine analog, it is transported into cells using an aspartic/glutamic acid (D/E) transporter. The size, shape, and charge distribution of glyphosate closely resembles D/E, and, therefore, glyphosate is a D/E amino acid mimic. The mitochondria use D/E in several pathways and mRNA-encoding mitochondrial proteins are differentially expressed during glyphosate exposure. Mutants downstream of Aro1 are not only sensitive to glyphosate but also a broad range of other chemicals that cannot be rescued by exogenous supplementation of aromatic amino acids. Glyphosate also decreases the pH when unbuffered and many studies do not consider the differences in pH that affect toxicity and resistance mechanisms.

Keywords: Amino acid mimic; Aro1; Dip5; EPSPS; Genetic variation; Glyphosate; Herbicide; In-lab evolutions; Microbial resistance; Non-target-site resistance; Target-site resistance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have not disclosed any competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Shikimate pathway Phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP) and D-erythrose 4-phosphate (E4P) are the precursors to produce chorismate. Yeast (purple) and bacterial proteins (blue or grey) are labeled. Relevant compounds are in black. Glyphosate inhibits Aro1/AroA/EPSPS
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Chemical structures of amino acids and glyphosate Glyphosate is glycine analog that is likely transported through the same permease as aspartate and glutamate. Glyphosate has similar size, shape and charge distribution as aspartate and glutamate, suggesting that glyphosate is an amino acid mimic
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
pH of yeast minimal media with pure glyphosate added at different concentrations

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ayers MC, Sherman ZN, Gallagher JEG. Oxidative stress responses and nutrient starvation in MCHM treated saccharomyces cerevisiae. G3 Genes. Genomes, Genet. 2020;10:4665–4678. doi: 10.1534/g3.120.401661. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barney JB, Winans MJ, Blackwood CB, et al. The yeast atlas of appalachia: species and phenotypic diversity of herbicide resistance in wild yeast. Diversity. 2020;12:139. doi: 10.3390/d12040139. - DOI
    1. Baucom RS, Mauricio R. Fitness costs and benefits of novel herbicide tolerance in a noxious weed. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:13386–13390. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0404306101. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baucom RS, Mauricio R. Constraints on the evolution of tolerance to herbicide in the common morning glory: resistance and tolerance are mutually exclusive. Evolution. 2008;62:2842–2854. doi: 10.1111/J.1558-5646.2008.00514.X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Benbrook CM. Trends in glyphosate herbicide use in the United States and globally. Environ Sci Eur. 2016;28:1–15. doi: 10.1186/S12302-016-0070-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources