Design of an algorithm for the detection of intravenous fluid contamination in clinical laboratory samples
- PMID: 37270688
- DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2023-0200
Design of an algorithm for the detection of intravenous fluid contamination in clinical laboratory samples
Abstract
Objectives: Contamination of blood samples from patients receiving intravenous fluids is a common error with potential risk to the patient. Algorithms based on the presence of aberrant results have been described but have the limitation that not all infusion fluids have the same composition. Our objective is to develop an algorithm based on the detection of the dilution observed on the analytes not usually included in infusion fluids.
Methods: A group of 89 cases was selected from samples flagged as contaminated. Contamination was confirmed by reviewing the clinical history and comparing the results with previous and subsequent samples. A control group with similar characteristics was selected. Eleven common biochemical parameters not usually included in infusion fluids and with low intraindividual variability were selected. The dilution in relation to the immediate previous results was calculated for each analyte and a global indicator, defined as the percentage of analytes with significant dilution, was calculated. ROC curves were used to define the cut-off points.
Results: A cut-off point of 20 % of dilutional effect requiring also a 60 % dilutional ratio achieved a high specificity (95 % CI 91-98 %) with an adequate sensitivity (64 % CI 54-74 %). The Area Under Curve obtained was 0.867 (95 % CI 0.819-0.915).
Conclusions: Our algorithm based on the global dilutional effect presents a similar sensitivity but greater specificity than the systems based on alarming results. The implementation of this algorithm in the laboratory information systems may facilitate the automated detection of contaminated samples.
Keywords: algorithm; blood specimen collection; intravenous infusions; post analytical phase; pre-analytical phase; sample contamination.
© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.
References
-
- Najat, D. Prevalence of pre-analytical errors in clinical chemistry diagnostic labs in Sulaimani city of Iraqi Kurdistan. PLoS One 2017;12:e0170211. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170211 . - DOI
-
- Mukhopadhyay, T, Subramanian, A, Pandey, S, Madaan, N, Trikha, A, Malhotra, R. The rise in preanalytical errors during COVID-19 pandemic. Biochem Med 2021;31:318–24. https://doi.org/10.11613/bm.2021.020710 . - DOI
-
- Cornes, MP, Atherton, J, Pourmahram, G, Borthwick, H, Kyle, B, West, J, et al.. Monitoring and reporting of preanalytical errors in laboratory medicine: the UK situation. Ann Clin Biochem Int J Lab Med 2016;53:279–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004563215599561 . - DOI
-
- Lippi, G, Betsou, F, Cadamuro, J, Cornes, M, Fleischhacker, M, Fruekilde, P, et al.. Preanalytical challenges – time for solutions. Clin Chem Lab Med 2019;57:974–81. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2018-1334 . - DOI
-
- Lippi, G, Becan-McBride, K, Behúlová, D, Bowen, RA, Church, S, Delanghe, J, et al.. Preanalytical quality improvement: in quality we trust. Clin Chem Lab Med 2013;51:229–41. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2012-0597 . - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources