A qualitative analysis of child protection professionals' challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic
- PMID: 37271117
- PMCID: PMC10160522
- DOI: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2023.106229
A qualitative analysis of child protection professionals' challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic
Abstract
Purpose: Child Protection Professionals (CPPs) play a key role in providing insights into the child protection system and how it can best support children's right to personal security, particularly during trying times like the COVID-19 pandemic. Qualitative research provides one potential tool to tap into this knowledge and awareness. This research thus expanded earlier qualitative work on CPPs' perceptions of the impact of COVID-19 on their work, including potential struggles and barriers, into the context of a developing country.
Methods: A total of 309 CPPs from all five regions in Brazil answered demographics, pandemic-related resilient behaviors, and open-ended questions regarding their profession during the pandemic.
Results: Data went through a three-step process of analysis: (1) pre-analysis; (2) category creation; and (3) coding of responses. Five categories emerged from the analysis: the Pandemic's Impact on CPPs' Work; the Impact of the Pandemic on CPP-Involved Families; Occupational Concerns during the Pandemic; Politics and the Pandemic; and Vulnerability due to the Pandemic.
Conclusions: Our qualitative analyses showed the pandemic resulted in increased challenges for CPPs across several fronts within their workplace. Although each of these categories is discussed separately, they all influenced one another. This highlights the need to continue efforts to support CPPs.
Keywords: Child protection; Child protection professionals; Child protective services; Covid-19; Pandemic.
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The Author(s) declare(s) that there is no conflict of interest or funding provided for this research.
Figures
References
-
- Baltar F., Brunet I. Social research 2.0: virtual snowball sampling method using Facebook. Internet Research. 2012;22(1):57–74. doi: 10.1108/10662241211199960. - DOI
-
- Bardin L. Almedina; São Paulo: 2011. Análise de conteúdo [Content analysis]
-
- Braun V., Clarke V., Boulton E., Davey L., McEvoy C. The online survey as a qualitative research tool. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 2021;24(6):641–654. doi: 10.1080/13645579.2020.1805550. - DOI
-
- Bride B.E., Jones J.L., MacMaster S.A. Correlates of secondary traumatic stress in child protective services workers. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work. 2007;4(3–4):69–80. doi: 10.1300/J394v04n03_05. - DOI
-
- Burton W.B., Civitano A., Steiner-Grossman P. Online versus paper evaluations: differences in both quantitative and qualitative data. Journal of Computing in Higher Education. 2012;24:58–69. doi: 10.1007/s12528-012-9053-3. - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
