Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr;117(4):725-732.
doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2023.04.046. Epub 2023 Jun 3.

Outcomes of Lung Transplant Candidates Aged ≥70 Years During the Lung Allocation Score Era

Affiliations

Outcomes of Lung Transplant Candidates Aged ≥70 Years During the Lung Allocation Score Era

Alice L Zhou et al. Ann Thorac Surg. 2024 Apr.

Abstract

Background: With the increasing age of lung transplant candidates, we studied waitlist and posttransplantation outcomes of candidates ≥70 years during the Lung Allocation Score era.

Methods: Adult lung transplant candidates from 2005 to 2020 in the United Network for Organ Sharing database were included and stratified on the basis of age at listing into 18 to 59 years old, 60 to 69 years old, and ≥70 years old. Baseline characteristics, waitlist outcomes, and posttransplantation outcomes were assessed.

Results: A total of 37,623 candidates were included (52.3% aged 18-59 years, 40.6% aged 60-69 years, 7.1% aged ≥70 years). Candidates ≥70 years were more likely than younger candidates to receive a transplant (81.9% vs 72.7% [aged 60-69 years] vs 61.6% [aged 18-59 years]) and less likely to die or to deteriorate on the waitlist within 1 year (9.1% vs 10.1% [aged 60-69 years] vs 12.2% [aged 18-59 years]; P < .001). Donors for older recipients were more likely to be extended criteria (75.7% vs 70.1% [aged 60-69 years] vs 65.7% [aged 18-59 years]; P < .001). Recipients ≥70 years were found to have lower rates of acute rejection (6.7% vs 7.4% [aged 60-69 years] vs 9.2% [aged 18-59 years]; P < .001) and prolonged intubation (21.7% vs 27.4% [aged 60-69 years] vs 34.5% [aged 18-59 years]; P < .001). Recipients aged ≥70 years had increased 1-year (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.19 [95% CI, 1.06-1.33]; P < .001), 3-year (aHR, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.18-1.39]; P < .001), and 5-year mortality (aHR, 1.29 [95% CI, 1.21-1.38]; P < .001) compared with recipients aged 60 to 69 years.

Conclusions: Candidates ≥70 years had favorable waitlist and perioperative outcomes despite increased use of extended criteria donors. Careful selection of candidates and postoperative surveillance may improve posttransplantation survival in this population.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest: None

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Waitlist outcomes of lung transplant candidates 2005-2020, by age. (A) Cumulative incidence of waitlist death/delisting within one year. (B) Cumulative incidence of transplant within one year.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Trends in transplanting lung transplant candidates ≥70 years. (A) Percent of recipients ≥70 years at listing, by transplant year. (B) Number of total lung transplant centers (solid line) and centers performing ≥1 transplant in lung transplant candidates ≥70 years (dashed line).
Figure 3:
Figure 3:
5-year unadjusted Kaplan Meier survival curves for lung transplants by age, 2005-2020.
Figure 4:
Figure 4:
1-year unadjusted Kaplan Meier survival curves in candidates ≥70 years by transplant era.
Figure 5:
Figure 5:
5-year unadjusted Kaplan Meier survival curves in candidates ≥70 years by transplant type (bilateral versus single).

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Egan TM, Murray S, Bustami RT, et al. Development of the New Lung Allocation System in the United States. American Journal of Transplantation. 2006;6(5p2):1212–1227. - PubMed
    1. Benvenuto LJ, Arcasoy SM. The new allocation era and policy. J Thorac Dis. 2021;13(11):6504–6513. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Valapour M, Lehr CJ, Skeans MA, et al. OPTN/SRTR 2017 Annual Data Report: Lung. American Journal of Transplantation. 2019;19(S2):404–484. - PubMed
    1. Leard LE, Holm AM, Valapour M, et al. Consensus document for the selection of lung transplant candidates: An update from the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation. 2021;40(11):1349–1379. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arjuna A, Olson MT, Walia R. Current trends in candidate selection, contraindications, and indications for lung transplantation. Journal of Thoracic Disease. 2021;13(11). - PMC - PubMed