Comparing the Effectiveness of Propranolol versus Atenolol in Inducing Clinical Clearance in the Treatment of Infantile Haemangioma: A Randomised Controlled Trial
- PMID: 37275818
- PMCID: PMC10238967
- DOI: 10.4103/ijd.ijd_867_22
Comparing the Effectiveness of Propranolol versus Atenolol in Inducing Clinical Clearance in the Treatment of Infantile Haemangioma: A Randomised Controlled Trial
Abstract
Background: Despite the excellent clinical efficacy of oral propranolol in the management of infantile haemangiomas (IHs), there is a need to further evaluate other beta blockers that may be equally efficacious but result in lesser adverse effects. We compared the efficacy and short-term safety of atenolol, a hydrophilic cardio-selective beta blocker, with propranolol, in the treatment of IHs.
Materials and methods: Sixty patients with complicated and/or cosmetically significant IHs were randomised into two groups, oral propranolol group (2 mg/kg/day) and the oral atenolol (1 mg/kg/day) group, respectively, for 9 months. Patients were assessed clinically, by the use of Doppler ultrasonography (USG) and measurement of serum hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha (HIF-1α).
Results: Twenty-two of 30 patients achieved complete clearance in the propranolol group (0.73; 95% CI = 0.54 to 0.87) compared with 13 of 25 patients in the atenolol group (0.52; 95% CI = 0.31 to 0.72). The mean time to achieve Physician Global Assessment Score 5 (PGA5) (25.00 ± 8.87 weeks) was significantly lesser in the propranolol group versus the atenolol group (31.69 ± 7.01 weeks; log-rank = 0.04). The two groups were comparable in terms of adverse effect profile, degree of volume reduction in USG and reduction in HIF-1α levels.
Conclusions: Propranolol (2 mg/kg/day) is better than atenolol (1 mg/kg/day) in inducing complete clinical clearance of IH although the results need to be reproduced in larger studies.
Keywords: Atenolol; infantile haemangioma; propranolol.
Copyright: © 2023 Indian Journal of Dermatology.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no conflicts of interest.
Figures




References
-
- Frieden IJ, Haggstrom AN, Drolet BA, Mancini AJ, Friedlander SF, Boon L, et al. Infantile hemangiomas: Current knowledge, future directions.Proceedings of a research workshop on infantile hemangiomas, April 7-9, 2005, Bethesda, Maryland, USA. Pediatr Dermatol. 2005;22:383–406. - PubMed
-
- Léauté-Labrèze C, Dumas de la Roque E, Hubiche T, Boralevi F, Thambo JB, Taïeb A. Propranolol for severe hemangiomas of infancy. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:2649–51. - PubMed
-
- Langley A, Pope E. Propranolol and central nervous system function: Potential implications for paediatric patients with infantile haemangiomas. Br J Dermatol. 2015;172:13–23. - PubMed
-
- Ábarzúa-Araya A, Navarrete-Dechent CP, Heusser F, Retamal J, Zegpi-Trueba MS. Atenolol versus propranolol for the treatment of infantile hemangiomas: A randomized controlled study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014;70:1045–9. - PubMed
-
- Léauté-Labrèze C, Hoeger P, Mazereeuw-Hautier J, Guibaud L, Baselga E, Posiunas G, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of oral propranolol in infantile hemangioma. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:735–46. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources