Evaluation of the Prescribing Skills Assessment implementation, performance and medical student experience in Australia and New Zealand
- PMID: 37276579
- DOI: 10.1111/bcp.15814
Evaluation of the Prescribing Skills Assessment implementation, performance and medical student experience in Australia and New Zealand
Abstract
Aims: The UK Prescribing Safety Assessment was modified for use in Australia and New Zealand (ANZ) as the Prescribing Skills Assessment (PSA). We investigated the implementation, student performance and acceptability of the ANZ PSA for final-year medical students.
Methods: This study used a mixed-method approach involving student data (n = 6440) for 2017-2019 (PSA overall score and 8 domain subscores). Data were also aggregated by medical school and included student evaluation survey results. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive and multivariate analyses. The pass rate was established by a modified Angoff method. Thematic analyses of open-ended survey comments were conducted.
Results: The average pass rate was slightly higher in 2017 (89%) which used a different examination to 2018 (85%) and 2019 (86%). Little difference was identified between schools for the PSA overall performance or domain subscores. There was low intercorrelation between subscores. Most students provided positive feedback about the PSA regarding the interface and clarity of questions, but an average of 35% reported insufficient time for completion. Further, 70% on average felt unprepared by their school curricula for the PSA, which is in part explained by the low prescribing experience; 69% reported completing ≤10 prescriptions during training.
Conclusion: The ANZ PSA was associated with high pass rates and acceptability, although student preparedness was highlighted as a concern for further investigation. We demonstrate how a collaboration of medical schools can adapt a medical education assessment resource (UK PSA) as a means for fulfilling an unmet need.
Keywords: assessment; clinical pharmacology; education; error; medication safety; prescribing; undergraduate.
© 2023 The Authors. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Pharmacological Society.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Sheikh A, Dhingra-Kumar N, Kelley E, Kieny MP, Donaldson LJ. The third global patient safety challenge: tackling medication-related harm. Bull World Health Organ. 2017;95(8):546-546A. doi:10.2471/BLT.17.198002
-
- Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. Medication Without Harm-WHO Global Patient Safety Challenge-Australia's Response. ACSQHC; 2020.
-
- Mucklow J, Bollington L, Maxwell S. Assessing prescribing competence. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2012;74(4):632-639. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2125.2011.04151.x
-
- Brinkman DJ, Tichelaar J, Graaf S, Otten RHJ, Richir MC, van Agtmael MA. Do final-year medical students have sufficient prescribing competencies? A systematic literature review. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018;84(4):615-635. doi:10.1111/bcp.13491
-
- Hilmer SN, Seale JP, Le Couteur DG, Crampton R, Liddle C. Do medical courses adequately prepare interns for safe and effective prescribing in New South Wales public hospitals? Intern Med J. 2009;39(7):428-434. doi:10.1111/j.1445-5994.2009.01942.x
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous