Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society Consensus Guidelines for Emergency Laparotomy Part 3: Organizational Aspects and General Considerations for Management of the Emergency Laparotomy Patient
- PMID: 37277506
- PMCID: PMC10241556
- DOI: 10.1007/s00268-023-07039-9
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society Consensus Guidelines for Emergency Laparotomy Part 3: Organizational Aspects and General Considerations for Management of the Emergency Laparotomy Patient
Abstract
Background: This is Part 3 of the first consensus guidelines for optimal care of patients undergoing emergency laparotomy using an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) approach. This paper addresses organizational aspects of care.
Methods: Experts in management of the high-risk and emergency general surgical patient were invited to contribute by the International ERAS® Society. PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and MEDLINE database searches were performed for ERAS elements and relevant specific topics. Studies were selected with particular attention to randomized clinical trials, systematic reviews, meta-analyses and large cohort studies, and reviewed and graded using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Recommendations were made on the best level of evidence, or extrapolation from studies on elective patients when appropriate. A modified Delphi method was used to validate final recommendations.
Results: Components of organizational aspects of care were considered. Consensus was reached after three rounds of a modified Delphi process.
Conclusions: These guidelines are based on best current available evidence for organizational aspects of an ERAS® approach to patients undergoing emergency laparotomy and include discussion of less common aspects of care for the surgical patient, including end-of-life issues. These guidelines are not exhaustive but pull together evidence on important components of care for this high-risk patient population. As much of the evidence is extrapolated from elective surgery or emergency general surgery (not specifically laparotomy), many of the components need further evaluation in future studies.
© 2023. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Dr. Scott has honoraria from and serves on advisory boards of Baxter, Edwards Lifesciences, Deltex, Trevena, and Merck. He also receives travel reimbursement from these companies and is President of ERAS® USA. Dr. Peden has received consultancy fees from the American College of Surgeons Improving Care and Surgical Recovery program, and from Medtronic for unrelated work, and is Executive Medical Director for Clinical Quality for the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association, USA. Dr. Lobo has received an unrestricted educational grant from B. Braun and speaker’s honoraria from Abbott, Corza and Nestlé for unrelated work. He is the Scientific Chair of the ERAS® Society. Dr. Wu has nothing to disclose. Dr. Hübner has nothing to disclose. Dr. Lees has nothing to disclose. Dr. Urman has received research funding or fees from Merck, Covidien/Medtronic, AcelRx and Pfizer outside the submitted work, as well as federal funding from NIH, AHRQ and NSF. Dr. Aitken has nothing to disclose. Dr. Anderson has nothing to disclose. Dr. Grant has nothing to disclose. Dr. Hammarqvist has nothing to disclose. Dr. Hare has nothing to disclose. Dr. Havens has research grant funding from Johnson and Johnson outside the submitted work. Dr Johnston has nothing to disclose, Dr Ljungqvist is the Chairman of the ERAS® Society, founded and owns stock in Encare AB, and has received honoraria for advice, lecturing including travel support from Nutricia, Fresenius-Kabi, Pharmacosmos, Encare AB, and lecturing honoraria from Medtronic and BBraun outside the related work. Dr Ljungqvist previously held a now expired patent for a preoperative carbohydrate drink. Angie Balfour—ERAS® Coach, Encare®. Co-Director of The Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Society (UK) C.I.C. (not-for-profit organization—Company No. 10932208). No relevant conflict of interest related to this work.
Dr. Ordoñez has nothing to disclose. Dr. Kim has nothing to disclose. Dr. French has nothing to disclose. Dr. Aggarwal has nothing to disclose. Dr. Quiney has nothing to disclose. Dr. Holena has nothing to disclose. Dr. Cooper has funding from the National Institute on Aging and the John A. Hartford Foundation outside of the submitted work. Dr. Wick has funding from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality outside the submitted work. Dr. Bang Foss has nothing to disclose. Dr. Young-Fadok has nothing to disclose. Dr. Mohseni has nothing to disclose. Dr. Dhesi has nothing to disclose. Dr. Sharoky has nothing to disclose.
Figures


References
-
- Peden CJ, Aggarwal G, Aitken RJ, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care for emergency laparotomy enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) society recommendations: part 1-preoperative: diagnosis, rapid assessment and optimization. World J Surg. 2021;45:1272–1290. doi: 10.1007/s00268-021-05994-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. Going from evidence to recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336:1049–1051. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39493.646875.AE. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Brown BB. Delphi process: a methodology used for the elicitation of opinions of experts. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation; 1968.
-
- NELA Project Team (2017) Audit inclusion and exclusion criteria: NELA inclusion criteria. In: National emergency laparotomy audit. https://www.nela.org.uk/Criteria. Accessed 20 Aug 2019