The Impairment Argument and Future-Like-Ours: A Problematic Dependence
- PMID: 37278912
- DOI: 10.1007/s11673-023-10262-7
The Impairment Argument and Future-Like-Ours: A Problematic Dependence
Abstract
In response to criticism of the impairment argument for the immorality of abortion, Bruce Blackshaw and Perry Hendricks appeal to Don Marquis's future-like-ours (FLO) account of the wrongness of killing to explain why knowingly causing fetal impairments is wrong. I argue that wedding the success of the impairment argument to FLO undermines all claims that the impairment argument for the immorality of abortion is novel. Moreover, I argue that relying on FLO when there are alternative explanations for the wrongness of causing FAS begs the question. I conclude, therefore, that the impairment argument remains unsuccessful.
Keywords: Abortion; Fetal harms; Future-like-ours; Impairment.
© 2023. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry Pty Ltd.
Comment on
-
Even if the fetus is not a person, abortion is immoral: The impairment argument.Bioethics. 2019 Feb;33(2):245-253. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12533. Epub 2018 Nov 27. Bioethics. 2019. PMID: 30480820
References
-
- Blackshaw, B. 2019. The impairment argument for the immorality of abortion: A reply. Bioethics 33(6): 723–724.
-
- ____. 2020. The impairment argument for the immorality of abortion revisited. Bioethics 34(2): 211–213.
-
- ____. 2021. Strengthened impairment argument does not restate Marquis. Journal of Medical Ethics 47(12): 841–842.
-
- ____. 2022. The non-identity problem and the psychological account of personal identity. Philosophia 50(2): 425–436.
-
- Blackshaw, B.P., and P. Hendricks. 2021a. Strengthening the impairment argument against abortion. Journal of Medical Ethics 47(7): 515–518.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
