Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul 4;95(26):9805-9812.
doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.3c00573. Epub 2023 Jun 6.

Nanopore Filter: A Method for Counting and Extracting Single DNA Molecules Using a Biological Nanopore

Affiliations

Nanopore Filter: A Method for Counting and Extracting Single DNA Molecules Using a Biological Nanopore

Asuka Tada et al. Anal Chem. .

Abstract

This paper describes a method for the real-time counting and extraction of DNA molecules at the single-molecule level by nanopore technology. As a powerful tool for electrochemical single-molecule detection, nanopore technology eliminates the need for labeling or partitioning sample solutions at the femtoliter level. Here, we attempt to develop a DNA filtering system utilizing an α-hemolysin (αHL) nanopore. This system comprises two droplets, one filling with and one emptying DNA molecules, separated by a planar lipid bilayer containing αHL nanopores. The translocation of DNA through the nanopores is observed by measuring the channel current, and the number of translocated molecules can also be verified by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). However, we found that the issue of contamination seems to be an almost insolvable problem in single-molecule counting. To tackle this problem, we tried to optimize the experimental environment, reduce the volume of solution containing the target molecule, and use the PCR clamp method. Although further efforts are still needed to achieve a single-molecule filter with electrical counting, our proposed method shows a linear relationship between the electrical counting and qPCR estimation of the number of DNA molecules.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(a) Photograph of the microdevice used for lipid bilayer preparation. Two chambers are separated by a separator with a parylene film. (b) Illustration of the droplet contact method and collection of single molecules of DNA. Immediately after a single molecule of DNA passes through the αHL pore in the lipid bilayer, the separator is slid across to intercept the bilayer.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(a) Schematic illustration of the nanopore filter experiments. After observing 30 blockage signals, the solution in the chamber connected to the recording terminal of a patch-clamp amplifier was collected. Then, the DNA was quantified by qPCR assay. (b) Amplification curves obtained from the filtered target DNA and 106 molecules of the target DNA by real-time PCR assay. Similar Ct values were obtained from these samples. (c) Amplification curves obtained from 102 molecules of the target DNA in different salt solutions. DNA amplification was observed only when using NH4Cl and MilliQ with the PCR solution. (d) Calibration curves of the Ct value versus the molecular number with 94 mM NH4Cl and MilliQ with the PCR solution. The Ct value can fit linearly with the natural logarithmic value of the DNA number. The literature value was referenced from N. Jothikumar et al., J. Virol. Methods, 2006.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(a) Amplification curves of the negative control before and after improvements. In the improved situation, there was no DNA amplification after 45 cycles. (b) DNA numbers obtained from controlled experiments. The DNA numbers increased with increasing concentration of DNA added to the droplet. (c) Amplification curves with and without an applied negative transmembrane potential (−180 mV) and negatively charged lipid in the oil. The Ct value were 14.0, 17.9, and 15.6 for the normal, −180 mV, and the negatively charged lipid conditions, respectively.
Figure 4
Figure 4
(a) Schematic illustration of the CBB system. A lipid bilayer is formed by the contact of two water droplets bubbled from glass pipettes on the microscope. (b) Microscopic image during pBLM formation by the CBB method. The diameters of the emulsion and the lipid bilayer were around 50 and 5 μm, respectively. (c) Control data of the nanopore filter experiments using the CBB method. One droplet contained 100 nM (1011 molecules) or 0 M target DNA. 10 min after forming pBLMs, another droplet was collected, and the number of the target DNA was quantified by qPCR assay.
Figure 5
Figure 5
(a) Schematic illustration of the nanopore filter using PNA-DNA duplexes. Because the contaminated DNA is hydrolyzed with PNA, PCR amplification is inhibited. (b) Typical recorded channel current obtained by translocating PNA-DNA duplexes through the αHL nanopore. (c) Number of DNA molecules obtained from controlled experiments with and without 3 nM PNA. (d) Amplification curves and the quantitated DNA numbers for the nanopore-filtered DNA solution and the control experiment with 10 pM DNA and 30 pM PNA. The R2 value is 0.9.

Similar articles

Cited by

  • Lipid vesicle-based molecular robots.
    Peng Z, Iwabuchi S, Izumi K, Takiguchi S, Yamaji M, Fujita S, Suzuki H, Kambara F, Fukasawa G, Cooney A, Di Michele L, Elani Y, Matsuura T, Kawano R. Peng Z, et al. Lab Chip. 2024 Feb 27;24(5):996-1029. doi: 10.1039/d3lc00860f. Lab Chip. 2024. PMID: 38239102 Free PMC article. Review.
  • Redesign of Translocon EXP2 Nanopore for Detecting Peptide Fragments.
    Miyagi M, Yamaji M, Kurokawa N, Yohda M, Kawano R. Miyagi M, et al. Small Methods. 2025 Apr;9(4):e2401562. doi: 10.1002/smtd.202401562. Epub 2025 Feb 5. Small Methods. 2025. PMID: 39905884 Free PMC article.

References

    1. Tan C. S.; Fleming A. M.; Ren H.; Burrows C. J.; White H. S. γ-Hemolysin Nanopore Is Sensitive to Guanine-to-Inosine Substitutions in Double-Stranded DNA at the Single-Molecule Level. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 14224–14234. 10.1021/jacs.8b08153. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shoji K.; Kawano R.; White R. J. Spatially Resolved Chemical Detection with a Nanoneedle-Probe-Supported Biological Nanopore. ACS Nano 2019, 13, 2606–2614. 10.1021/acsnano.8b09667. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Denuga S.; Whelan D. E.; O’Neill S. P.; Johnson R. P. Capture and analysis of double-stranded DNA with the α-hemolysin nanopore: Fundamentals and applications. Electrochem. Sci. Adv. 2022, 2, e220000110.1002/elsa.202200001. - DOI
    1. Watanabe H.; Gubbiotti A.; Chinappi M.; Takai N.; Tanaka K.; Tsumoto K.; Kawano R. Analysis of pore formation and protein translocation using large biological nanopores. Anal. Chem. 2017, 89, 11269–11277. 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b01550. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Miyagi M.; Takiguchi S.; Hakamada K.; Yohda M.; Kawano R. Single polypeptide detection using a translocon EXP2 nanopore. Proteomics 2022, 22, e210007010.1002/pmic.202100070. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types