ePrescribing-Based Antimicrobial Stewardship Practices in an English National Health Service Hospital: Qualitative Interview Study Among Medical Prescribers and Pharmacists
- PMID: 37279044
- PMCID: PMC10282906
- DOI: 10.2196/37863
ePrescribing-Based Antimicrobial Stewardship Practices in an English National Health Service Hospital: Qualitative Interview Study Among Medical Prescribers and Pharmacists
Abstract
Background: Antimicrobial resistance, the ability of microorganisms to survive antimicrobial drugs, is a public health emergency. Although electronic prescribing (ePrescribing)-based interventions designed to reduce unnecessary antimicrobial usage exist, these often do not integrate effectively with existing workflows. As a result, ePrescribing-based interventions may have limited impact in addressing antimicrobial resistance.
Objective: We sought to understand the existing ePrescribing-based antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) practices in an English hospital preceding the implementation of functionality designed to improve AMS.
Methods: We conducted 18 semistructured interviews with medical prescribers and pharmacists with varying levels of seniority exploring current AMS practices and investigating potential areas for improvement. Participants were recruited with the help of local gatekeepers. Topic guides sought to explore both formal and informal practices surrounding AMS, and challenges and opportunities for ePrescribing-based intervention. We coded audio-recorded and transcribed data with the help of the Technology, People, Organizations, and Macroenvironmental factors framework, allowing emerging themes to be added inductively. We used NVivo 12 (QSR International) to facilitate coding.
Results: Antimicrobial prescribing and review processes were characterized by competing priorities and uncertainty of prescribers and reviewers around prescribing decisions. For example, medical prescribers often had to face trade-offs between individual patient benefit and more diffuse population health benefits, and the rationale for prescribing decisions was not always clear. Prescribing involved a complex set of activities carried out by various health care practitioners who each only had a partial and temporary view of the whole process, and whose relationships were characterized by deeply engrained hierarchies that shaped interactions and varied across specialties. For example, newly qualified doctors and pharmacists were hesitant to change a consultant's prescribing decision when reviewing prescriptions. Multidisciplinary communication, collaboration, and coordination promoted good AMS practices by reducing uncertainty.
Conclusions: Design of ePrescribing-based interventions to improve AMS needs to take into account the multitude of actors and organizational complexities involved in the prescribing and review processes. Interventions that help reduce prescriber or reviewer uncertainty and improve multidisciplinary collaboration surrounding initial antimicrobial prescribing and subsequent prescription review are most likely to be effective. Without such attention, interventions are unlikely to fulfill their goal of improving patient outcomes and combatting antimicrobial resistance.
Keywords: antimicrobial resistance; antimicrobial stewardship; electronic prescribing; hospitals.
©Kathrin Cresswell, Susan Hinder, Aziz Sheikh, Sarah Pontefract, Neil W Watson, David Price, Andrew Heed, Jamie Coleman, Holly Ennis, Jillian Beggs, Antony Chuter, Robin Williams. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 06.06.2023.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: None declared.
Similar articles
-
Complex Hospital-Based Electronic Prescribing-Based Intervention to Support Antimicrobial Stewardship: Qualitative Study.JMIR Form Res. 2024 Jul 26;8:e54458. doi: 10.2196/54458. JMIR Form Res. 2024. PMID: 39059001 Free PMC article.
-
Perceptions, current practices, and interventions of community pharmacists regarding antimicrobial stewardship: A qualitative study.J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2022 Jul-Aug;62(4):1239-1248.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2022.02.003. Epub 2022 Feb 11. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2022. PMID: 35305926
-
Mechanisms affecting the implementation of a national antimicrobial stewardship programme; multi-professional perspectives explained using normalisation process theory.Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2020 Jul 2;9(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s13756-020-00767-w. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2020. PMID: 32616015 Free PMC article.
-
Optimising antimicrobial stewardship interventions in English primary care: a behavioural analysis of qualitative and intervention studies.BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 17;10(12):e039284. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039284. BMJ Open. 2020. PMID: 33334829 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Development of an antimicrobial stewardship implementation model involving collaboration between general practitioners and pharmacists: GPPAS study in Australian primary care.Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2021 Jan 28;22:e2. doi: 10.1017/S1463423620000687. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2021. PMID: 33504411 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Complex Hospital-Based Electronic Prescribing-Based Intervention to Support Antimicrobial Stewardship: Qualitative Study.JMIR Form Res. 2024 Jul 26;8:e54458. doi: 10.2196/54458. JMIR Form Res. 2024. PMID: 39059001 Free PMC article.
-
Essential strategic principles for planning and developing digitally enabled interventions in health and care settings.BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Nov 13;24(1):1399. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11819-x. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024. PMID: 39538200 Free PMC article.
-
A complex ePrescribing antimicrobial stewardship-based (ePAMS+) intervention for hospitals: mixed-methods feasibility trial results.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Oct 11;24(1):301. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02707-9. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024. PMID: 39394550 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Murray CJ, Ikuta KS, Sharara F, Swetschinski L, Aguilar GR, Gray A, Han C, Bisignano C, Rao P, Wool F, Johnson SC. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis. Lancet. 2022;399(10325):629–655. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02724-0. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0140-6736(21)02724-0 S0140-6736(21)02724-0 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Combating antimicrobial resistance, a global threat. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. [2022-02-26]. https://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/index.html .
-
- Parker HM, Mattick K. The determinants of antimicrobial prescribing among hospital doctors in England: a framework to inform tailored stewardship interventions. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2016;82(2):431–440. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12953. https://bpspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bcp.12953 - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- A framework for understanding the antimicrobial crisis. ICON. [2022-02-26]. https://www.iconplc.com/insights/therapeutics/infectious-diseases/antimi...
-
- Grissinger M. The five rights: a destination without a map. Pharm Ther. 2010;35(10):542. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2957754/pdf/ptj35_10p542.pdf
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials