Fig. 3. Colitis dampens bile acid synthesis and transport in Mdr2−/− mice.
a PCA (principal component analysis) plot of liver RNA-seq data (n = 10 mice per group). b Heatmap of differentially expressed genes from hepatic RNA-seq data (n = 10 mice per group); Wald test with Benjamini-Hochberg adjustment (two-sided) (padj < 0.05 & Log2foldchange > 1 or < −1). c Suppressed pathways in DSS-treated Mdr2−/− liver identified by RNA-seq-based gene set enrichment analysis (n = 10 mice per group). d Heatmap of liver RNA-seq data shows downregulated genes (n = 10 mice per group). e mRNA expression of genes related to bile acid synthesis (WT, n = 5; Mdr2−/−, n = 10; WT + DSS, n = 7; Mdr2−/−+DSS, n = 12); one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test (Cyp8b1: WT vs Mdr2−/−, 95% CI 0.223–0.827, P = 0.0004; WT vs WT + DSS, 95% CI 0.1056–0.7512, P = 0.0063); Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparison test (Cyp7a1: WT vs WT + DSS, P = 0.0011; Mdr2−/− vs Mdr2−/−+DSS, P = 0.0197; Cyp27a1: WT vs WT + DSS, P = 0.0008; Mdr2−/− vs Mdr2−/−+DSS, P = 0.0018). f Western blot of liver Cyp7A1 (WT, n = 3; Mdr2−/−, n = 5; WT + DSS, n = 3; Mdr2−/−+DSS, n = 5). g mRNA expression of genes involved in bile acid trafficking (WT, n = 5; Mdr2−/−, n = 10; WT + DSS, n = 7; Mdr2−/−+DSS, n = 12); one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test (Oatp2: WT vs WT + DSS, 95% CI 0.3657–0.8851, P < 0.0001; Mdr2−/− vs Mdr2−/−+DSS, 95% CI 0.2581–0.6379, P < 0.0001; Mrp2: WT vs WT + DSS, 95% CI 0.1302 to 0.7397, P = 0.0042; Mdr2−/− vs Mdr2−/−+DSS, 95% CI 0.0725–0.5182, P = 0.0078); Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparison test (Ntcp: WT vs Mdr2−/−, P = 0.0361; Mdr2−/− vs Mdr2−/−+DSS, P = 0.0384; Bsep: Mdr2−/− vs Mdr2−/−+DSS, P = 0.0051). h Spatial distribution of taurocholic acid in the liver visualized by Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry imaging. (WT, n = 5; Mdr2−/−, n = 6; WT + DSS, n = 7; Mdr2−/−+DSS, n = 7) (scale bar, 300 µm; color bar, 147.8–1000). i Total bile acids of serum and portal serum (n = 5 mice per group); one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test (serum total BAs: WT vs Mdr2−/−, 95% CI −238,281 to −83,938, P < 0.0001; Mdr2−/− vs Mdr2−/−+DSS, 95% CI 31,605–185,948, P = 0.0044; portal serum total BAs: WT vs Mdr2−/−, 95% CI −537,812 to −240,590, P < 0.0001; Mdr2−/− vs Mdr2−/−+DSS, 95% CI 200,324–497,546, P < 0.0001). j C4 in serum (n = 5 mice per group); one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test (WT vs WT + DSS, 95% CI 141.7–296.5, P < 0.0001; Mdr2−/− vs Mdr2−/−+DSS, 95% CI 30.64–185.4, P = 0.0048). k Total bile acids of liver and cecum stool (n = 5 mice per group. For technical reason, bile acids can not be assayed in few samples leading to different sample sizes); one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test (liver total BAs: WT vs Mdr2−/−, 95% CI −338.6 to −11.27, P = 0.0336; Mdr2−/− vs Mdr2−/−+DSS, 95% CI 49.95–377.2, P = 0.0085; total BAs of cecum stool: Mdr2−/− vs Mdr2−/−+DSS, 95% CI 17.64–1,138, P = 0.0441).All data are expressed as mean ± SEM and considered statistically significant at *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 and ****p < 0.0001. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.