Consanguineous couples' experiences and views regarding expanded carrier screening: Barriers and facilitators in the decision-making process
- PMID: 37280360
- PMCID: PMC10242213
- DOI: 10.1038/s41431-023-01402-z
Consanguineous couples' experiences and views regarding expanded carrier screening: Barriers and facilitators in the decision-making process
Abstract
Expanded carrier screening (ECS) entails a screening offer for multiple recessive disorders at the same time, and allows testing of individuals or couples regardless of ancestry or geographic origin. Children of consanguineous couples have a higher-than-average risk of manifesting autosomal recessive disorders. This study aims to contribute to the responsible implementation of ECS for consanguineous couples. Seven semi-structured interviews were conducted with consanguineous couples who had recently participated in Whole Exome Sequencing (WES)-based ECS at Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), the Netherlands. The test offered at MUMC+ covers a large number of disease-related genes (~2000), including severe, relatively mild, early- and late-onset disorders. Respondents were interviewed about their views on, and experiences with participation in WES-based ECS. Overall, participation was experienced as worthwhile: it enabled respondents to make informed choices with regard to family planning as well as to take on the presumed parental responsibility to deliver their children as healthy as possible. Furthermore, our findings suggest that (1) true consent for having this test requires timely information about the possible implications of a positive test result for specific categories of findings, as well as about the success rates of the available reproductive options; (2) the clinical geneticist can play a pivotal part in informing participants as well as providing clear information about autosomal recessive inheritance; (3) more research is needed to explore what type of genetic risk information is considered 'meaningful' by participants and actually contributes to reproductive decision-making.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Society of Human Genetics.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
User Acceptability of Whole Exome Reproductive Carrier Testing for Consanguineous Couples in Australia.J Genet Couns. 2019 Apr;28(2):240-250. doi: 10.1007/s10897-018-0298-5. Epub 2018 Dec 14. J Genet Couns. 2019. PMID: 30964588
-
Interest in expanded carrier screening among individuals and couples in the general population: systematic review of the literature.Hum Reprod Update. 2020 Apr 15;26(3):335-355. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmaa001. Hum Reprod Update. 2020. PMID: 32099997
-
Couples' experiences with expanded carrier screening: evaluation of a university hospital screening offer.Eur J Hum Genet. 2021 Aug;29(8):1252-1258. doi: 10.1038/s41431-021-00923-9. Epub 2021 Jun 21. Eur J Hum Genet. 2021. PMID: 34155360 Free PMC article.
-
Attitudes of the general population towards preconception expanded carrier screening for autosomal recessive disorders including inborn errors of metabolism.Mol Genet Metab. 2019 Jan;126(1):14-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2018.12.004. Epub 2018 Dec 10. Mol Genet Metab. 2019. PMID: 30563741
-
Carrier screening and pregnancy.Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2025 Jun;100:102601. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2025.102601. Epub 2025 Mar 15. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2025. PMID: 40120478 Review.
Cited by
-
Deep phenotyping and population-level data can help resolve genomic variants.Eur J Hum Genet. 2023 Nov;31(11):1199-1200. doi: 10.1038/s41431-023-01483-w. Eur J Hum Genet. 2023. PMID: 37914779 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources