Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Nov;31(11):1317-1322.
doi: 10.1038/s41431-023-01402-z. Epub 2023 Jun 6.

Consanguineous couples' experiences and views regarding expanded carrier screening: Barriers and facilitators in the decision-making process

Affiliations

Consanguineous couples' experiences and views regarding expanded carrier screening: Barriers and facilitators in the decision-making process

Sanne van der Hout et al. Eur J Hum Genet. 2023 Nov.

Abstract

Expanded carrier screening (ECS) entails a screening offer for multiple recessive disorders at the same time, and allows testing of individuals or couples regardless of ancestry or geographic origin. Children of consanguineous couples have a higher-than-average risk of manifesting autosomal recessive disorders. This study aims to contribute to the responsible implementation of ECS for consanguineous couples. Seven semi-structured interviews were conducted with consanguineous couples who had recently participated in Whole Exome Sequencing (WES)-based ECS at Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), the Netherlands. The test offered at MUMC+ covers a large number of disease-related genes (~2000), including severe, relatively mild, early- and late-onset disorders. Respondents were interviewed about their views on, and experiences with participation in WES-based ECS. Overall, participation was experienced as worthwhile: it enabled respondents to make informed choices with regard to family planning as well as to take on the presumed parental responsibility to deliver their children as healthy as possible. Furthermore, our findings suggest that (1) true consent for having this test requires timely information about the possible implications of a positive test result for specific categories of findings, as well as about the success rates of the available reproductive options; (2) the clinical geneticist can play a pivotal part in informing participants as well as providing clear information about autosomal recessive inheritance; (3) more research is needed to explore what type of genetic risk information is considered 'meaningful' by participants and actually contributes to reproductive decision-making.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ropers HH. On the future of genetic risk assessment. J Community Genet. 2012;3:229–36. doi: 10.1007/s12687-012-0092-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fridman H, Yntema HG, Magi R, Andreson R, Metspalu A, Mezzavila M, et al. The landscape of autosomal-recessive pathogenic variants in European populations reveals phenotype-specific effects. Am J Hum Genet. 2021;108:608–19. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2021.03.004. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bittles AH, Black ML. The impact of consanguinity on neonatal and infant health. Early Hum Dev. 2010;86:737–41. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2010.08.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sheridan E, Wright J, Small N, Corry PC, Oddie S, Whibley C, et al. Risk factors for congenital anomaly in a multiethnic birth cohort: an analysis of the Born in Bradford study. Lancet. 2013;382:1350–9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61132-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hamamy H. Consanguineous marriages: Preconception consultation in primary health care settings. J Community Genet. 2012;3:185–92. doi: 10.1007/s12687-011-0072-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types