Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2023 Jun 7;23(1):134.
doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-01948-y.

Does the feedback of blood results in observational studies influence response and consent? A randomised study of the Understanding Society Innovation Panel

Michaela Benzeval  1 , Alexandria Andrayas  2   3 , Jan Mazza  4 , Tarek Al Baghal  2 , Jonathan Burton  2 , Thomas F Crossley  4 , Meena Kumari  2
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Does the feedback of blood results in observational studies influence response and consent? A randomised study of the Understanding Society Innovation Panel

Michaela Benzeval et al. BMC Med Res Methodol. .

Abstract

Background: While medical studies generally provide health feedback to participants, in observational studies this is not always the case due to logistical and financial difficulties, or concerns about changing observed behaviours. However, evidence suggests that lack of feedback may deter participants from providing biological samples. This paper investigates the effect of offering feedback of blood results on participation in biomeasure sample collection.

Methods: Participants aged 16 and over from a longitudinal study - the Understanding Society Innovation Panel-were randomised to three arms - nurse interviewer, interviewer, web survey - and invited to participate in biomeasures data collection. Within each arm they were randomised to receive feedback of their blood results or not. For those interviewed by a nurse both venous and dried blood samples (DBS) were taken in the interview. For the other two arms, they were asked if they would be willing to take a sample, and if they agreed a DBS kit was left or sent to them so the participant could take their own sample and return it. Blood samples were analysed and, if in the feedback arms, participants were sent their total cholesterol and HbA1c results. Response rates for feedback and non-feedback groups were compared: overall; in each arm of the study; by socio-demographic and health characteristics; and by previous study participation. Logistic regression models of providing a blood sample by feedback group and data collection approach controlling for confounders were calculated.

Results: Overall 2162 (80.3% of individuals in responding households) took part in the survey; of those 1053 (48.7%) consented to provide a blood sample. Being offered feedback had little effect on overall participation but did increase consent to provide a blood sample (unadjusted OR 1.38; CI: 1.16-1.64). Controlling for participant characteristics, the effect of feedback was highest among web participants (1.55; 1.11-2.17), followed by interview participants (1.35; 0.99 -1.84) and then nurse interview participants (1.30; 0.89-1.92).

Conclusions: Offering feedback of blood results increased willingness to give samples, especially for those taking part in a web survey.

Keywords: Demography; Feedback; Longitudinal study; Mode; Response rates; Socioeconomic factors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. MRC and Wellcome Trust. Framework on the feedback of health-related findings in research, MRC March 2014 https://mrc.ukri.org/documents/pdf/mrc-wellcome-trust-framework-on-the-f... Accessed 4 Oct 2021.
    1. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Returning Individual Research Results to Participants: Guidance for a New Research Paradigm. 2018. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. 10.17226/25094. Accessed from http://nap.edu/2509 10/4/2021. - PubMed
    1. Hunter J, Corcoran K, Leeder S, Phelps K. Appealing to altruism is not enough: motivators for participating in health services research. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2012;7(3):84–90. doi: 10.1525/jer.2012.7.3.84. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dahlin-Ivanoff S, Sterner TR, Blennow K, Skoog I, Falk Erhag H. Was it worth it? Older adults’ experiences of participating in a population-based cohort study – a focus group study. BMC Geriatr. 2019;19:224. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1238-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Merz S, Jaehn P, Pischon T, Fischere B, Wirkner K, Rach S, Guenther K, Obi N, Holmberg C. on behalf of the AdvanceGender Study Group Investigating people’s attitudes towards participating in longitudinal health research: an intersectionality-informed perspective. Int J Equity Health. 2023;22:23. doi: 10.1186/s12939-022-01807-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources