Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun 6;23(1):380.
doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08352-3.

Acceptance of diagnosis and management satisfaction of patients with "suspected Lyme borreliosis" after 12 months in a multidisciplinary reference center: a prospective cohort study

Affiliations

Acceptance of diagnosis and management satisfaction of patients with "suspected Lyme borreliosis" after 12 months in a multidisciplinary reference center: a prospective cohort study

Alice Raffetin et al. BMC Infect Dis. .

Abstract

Introduction: Because patients with a "suspicion of Lyme borreliosis (LB)" may experience medical wandering and difficult care paths, often due to misinformation, multidisciplinary care centers were started all over Europe a few years ago. The aim of our study was to prospectively identify the factors associated with the acceptance of diagnosis and management satisfaction of patients, and to assess the concordance of the medical health assessment between physicians and patients 12 months after their management at our multidisciplinary center.

Methods: We included all adults who were admitted to the Tick-Borne Diseases Reference Center of Paris and the Northern Region (TBD-RC) (2017-2020). A telephone satisfaction survey was conducted 12 months after their first consultation. It consisted of 5 domains and 13 items rated between 0 (lowest) and 10 (highest grade): (1)Reception; (2)Care and quality of management; (3)Information/explanations given to the patients; (4)Current medical condition and acceptance of the final diagnosis; (5)Overall appreciation. Factors associated with diagnosis acceptance and management satisfaction at 12 months were identified using logistic regression models. The concordance of the health status as assessed by doctors and patients was calculated using a Cohen's kappa test.

Results: Of the 569 patients who consulted, 349 (61.3%) answered the questionnaire. Overall appreciation had a median rating of 9 [8;10] and 280/349 (80.2%) accepted their diagnoses. Patients who were "very satisfied" with their care paths at TBD-RC (OR = 4.64;CI95%[1.52-14.16]) had higher odds of diagnosis acceptance. Well-delivered information was strongly associated with better satisfaction with the management (OR = 23.39;CI95%[3.52-155.54]). The concordance between patients and physicians to assess their health status 12 months after their management at TBD-RC was almost perfect in the groups of those with confirmed and possible LB (κ = 0.99), and moderate in the group with other diagnoses (κ = 0.43).

Conclusion: Patients seemed to approve of this multidisciplinary care organization for suspected LB. It helped them to accept their final diagnoses and enabled a high level of satisfaction with the information given by the doctors, confirming the importance of shared medical decisions, which may help to reduce health misinformation. This type of structure may be useful for any disease with a complex and controversial diagnosis.

Keywords: Concordance; Diagnostic acceptance; Lyme borreliosis; Multidisciplinary management; Satisfaction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Care path of the patients consulting for a suspicion of LB at TBD-RC. TBD-RC = Tick-Borne Disease Reference Center; LB = Lyme borreliosis; PTLDS = Post-Treatment Lyme Disease Syndrome
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Flow chart of the patients who were solicited to answer the satisfaction questionnaire at 12 months
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Comparative results of the overall appreciation between the 4 groups of patients at 12 months
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Comparison of the medical health assessment between the physicians and the patients at 12 months

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Schwartz AM, Hinckley AF, Mead PS, Hook SA, Kugeler KJ. Surveillance for Lyme disease - United States, 2008–2015. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2017;66(22):1–12. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6622a1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sykes RA, Makiello P. An estimate of Lyme borreliosis incidence in Western Europe†. J Public Health Oxf Engl. 2017;39(1):74–81. - PubMed
    1. Lohr B, Fingerle V, Norris DE, Hunfeld KP. Laboratory diagnosis of Lyme borreliosis: current state of the art and future perspectives. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2018;55(4):219–245. doi: 10.1080/10408363.2018.1450353. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Leeflang MMG, Ang CW, Berkhout J, Bijlmer HA, Van Bortel W, Brandenburg AH, et al. The diagnostic accuracy of serological tests for Lyme borreliosis in Europe: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Infect Dis. 2016;16(1). Available from: http://bmcinfectdis.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12879-016-1468-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Talagrand-Reboul E, Raffetin A, Zachary P, Jaulhac B, Eldin C. Immunoserological diagnosis of human borrelioses: current knowledge and perspectives. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020;10:241. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00241. - DOI - PMC - PubMed