Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr;157(4):239-249.
doi: 10.4103/ijmr.ijmr_2615_21.

Evaluation of Madras Diabetes Research Foundation-Indian Diabetes Risk Score in detecting undiagnosed diabetes in the Indian population: Results from the Indian Council of Medical Research-INdia DIABetes population-based study (INDIAB-15)

Affiliations

Evaluation of Madras Diabetes Research Foundation-Indian Diabetes Risk Score in detecting undiagnosed diabetes in the Indian population: Results from the Indian Council of Medical Research-INdia DIABetes population-based study (INDIAB-15)

Mohan Deepa et al. Indian J Med Res. 2023 Apr.

Abstract

Background & objectives: Screening of individuals for early detection and identification of undiagnosed diabetes can help in reducing the burden of diabetic complications. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of Madras Diabetes Research Foundation (MDRF)-Indian Diabetes Risk Score (IDRS) to screen for undiagnosed type 2 diabetes in a large representative population in India.

Methods: Data were acquired from the Indian Council of Medical Research-INdia DIABetes (ICMR-INDIAB) study, a large national survey that included both urban and rural populations from 30 states/union territories in India. Stratified multistage design was followed to obtain a sample of 113,043 individuals (94.2% response rate). MDRF-IDRS used four simple parameters, viz. age, waist circumference, family history of diabetes and physical activity to detect undiagnosed diabetes. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) with area under the curve (AUC) was used to assess the performance of MDRF-IDRS.

Results: We identified that 32.4, 52.7 and 14.9 per cent of the general population were under high-, moderate- and low-risk category of diabetes. Among the newly diagnosed individuals with diabetes [diagnosed by oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)], 60.2, 35.9 and 3.9 per cent were identified under high-, moderate- and low-risk categories of IDRS. The ROC-AUC for the identification of diabetes was 0.697 (95% confidence interval: 0.684-0.709) for urban population and 0.694 (0.684-0.704) for rural, as well as 0.693 (0.682-0.705) for males and 0.707 (0.697-0.718) for females. MDRF-IDRS performed well when the population were sub-categorized by state or by regions.

Interpretation & conclusions: Performance of MDRF-IDRS is evaluated across the nation and is found to be suitable for easy and effective screening of diabetes in Asian Indians.

Keywords: Asian Indians; Indian Diabetes Risk Score; high-risk group; screening; type 2 diabetes; undiagnosed diabetes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
ROC curve showing the performance of MDRF-IDRS among the (A) urban and (B) rural population in diagnosing diabetes. ROC, receiver operating characteristic; MDRF-IDRS, Madras Diabetes Research Foundation-Indian Diabetes Risk Score.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
ROC curve showing the performance of MDRF-IDRS among (A) male and (B) female population in diagnosing diabetes. ROC, receiver operating characteristic; MDRF-IDRS, Madras Diabetes Research Foundation-Indian Diabetes Risk Score.
Fig. S1
Fig. S1
The Indian Council of Medical Research–INdia DIABetes sampling strategy. Source26. ICMR–INDIAB, Indian Council of Medical Research–INdia DIABetes.
Fig. S2
Fig. S2
The Indian Council of Medical Research–INdia DIABetes sampling framework in rural areas. Source26. ICMR–INDIAB, Indian Council of Medical Research–INdia DIABetes; UT, union territory; PPS, probability proportional to population size.
Fig. S3
Fig. S3
The Indian Council of Medical Research–INdia DIABetes sampling framework in urban areas. Source26. ICMR–INDIAB, Indian Council of Medical Research–INdia DIABetes; UT, union territory.

References

    1. International Diabetes Federation. IDF diabetes atlas ninth edition. 2019. [accessed on May 01, 2021]. Available from: https://www.diabetesatlas.org/en//
    1. Galaviz KI, Narayan KMV, Lobelo F, Weber MB. Lifestyle and the prevention of type 2 diabetes: A status report. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2018;12:4–20. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kerrison G, Gillis RB, Jiwani SI, Alzahrani Q, Kok S, Harding SE, et al. The effectiveness of lifestyle adaptation for the prevention of prediabetes in adults: A systematic review. J Diabetes Res. 2017;2017:8493145. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mohan V, Deepa R, Deepa M, Somannavar S, Datta M. A simplified Indian diabetes risk score for screening for undiagnosed diabetic subjects. J Assoc Physicians India. 2005;53:759–63. - PubMed
    1. Mohan V, Anbalagan VP. Expanding role of the Madras Diabetes Research Foundation - Indian Diabetes Risk Score in clinical practice. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2013;17:31–6. - PMC - PubMed