Mid-term clinical and radiographic outcome of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing through an anterolateral approach
- PMID: 37285004
- DOI: 10.1007/s12306-023-00789-8
Mid-term clinical and radiographic outcome of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing through an anterolateral approach
Erratum in
-
Correction to: Mid‑term clinical and radiographic outcome of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing through an anterolateral approach.Musculoskelet Surg. 2024 Mar;108(1):123. doi: 10.1007/s12306-023-00794-x. Musculoskelet Surg. 2024. PMID: 37532959 No abstract available.
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the medium-term clinical and radiographic results of current generation metal-on-metal resurfacing prostheses performed through anterolateral approach.
Materials and methods: Fifty-seven hips in 52 patients underwent resurfacing arthroplasty. Two patients died from unrelated causes, leaving 55 hips in 35 males (3 bilateral) and 15 females (2 bilateral), with a mean age at surgery of 56.2 years (range, 27-70 years). Clinical and radiographic assessment was carried out preoperatively and at follow-up in all the survived cases. The cumulative survival rate was determined according to the method of Kaplan-Meier.
Results: At a mean follow-up of 5.2 years (range, 1.8-9.1 years), 2 HRs of the same female patient were revised because of early loosening of the acetabular component. Deep venous thrombosis and transient femoral nerve palsy occurred both in 1 case. No specific complications of HR were observed. Average Harris hip score improved significantly from 59.8 points (range, 30.4-90.6) preoperatively to 93.7 points (range, 53-100) at the latest examination. Neck narrowing showed an average of 3.27%, but it never exceeded 10%. Nonprogressive acetabular radiolucencies and osteolysis were detected both in 2 hips. A high rate of patients (32, 60.4%) developed heterotopic ossifications, although low-grade in most cases (27, 84.4%). The cumulative survival rate at 9.1 years with revision for any reason as the end point was 93.0%.
Conclusions: The early clinical and radiographic results of modern metal-on-metal hip resurfacing performed through an anterolateral approach are promising, but longer-term follow-up studies are necessary.
Keywords: Anterolateral approach; Heterotopic ossifications; Hip resurfacing; Metal-on-metal bearing; Total hip arthroplasty.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli.
Similar articles
-
Clinical and radiographic results of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing with a minimum ten-year follow-up.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Nov 17;92(16):2663-71. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.01715. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010. PMID: 21084576
-
Survivorship and clinical outcome of Birmingham hip resurfacing: a minimum ten years' follow-up.Int Orthop. 2016 Jan;40(1):1-7. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-2731-9. Epub 2015 Mar 31. Int Orthop. 2016. PMID: 25820838
-
Is the Survivorship of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing Better Than Selected Conventional Hip Arthroplasties in Men Younger Than 65 Years of Age? A Study from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Nov;478(11):2625-2636. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001453. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020. PMID: 32898048 Free PMC article.
-
Are Females at Greater Risk for Revision Surgery After Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty With the Articular Surface Replacement Prosthesis?Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Oct;474(10):2257-65. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4860-x. Epub 2016 Apr 27. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016. PMID: 27121872 Free PMC article.
-
Hip Anatomy and Biomechanics Relevant to Hip Replacement.2020 Jul 1. In: Rivière C, Vendittoli PA, editors. Personalized Hip and Knee Joint Replacement [Internet]. Cham (CH): Springer; 2020. Chapter 2. 2020 Jul 1. In: Rivière C, Vendittoli PA, editors. Personalized Hip and Knee Joint Replacement [Internet]. Cham (CH): Springer; 2020. Chapter 2. PMID: 33347135 Free Books & Documents. Review.
Cited by
-
Anterior Minimally Invasive Approach (AMIS) for Total Hip Arthroplasty: Analysis of the First 1000 Consecutive Patients Operated at a High Volume Center.J Clin Med. 2024 Apr 29;13(9):2617. doi: 10.3390/jcm13092617. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 38731146 Free PMC article.
References
-
- McMinn D, Treacy R, Lin K, Pynsent P (1996) Metal on metal surface replacement of the hip: experience of the McMinn prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 329:S89–S98. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199608001-00009 - DOI
-
- Wagner M, Wagner H (2000) Medium-term results of a modern metal-on-metal system in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 379:123–133. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200010000-00015 - DOI
-
- Mont MA, Schmalzried TP (2008) Modern metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: important observations from the first ten years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(Suppl 3):3–11. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.H.00750 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Amstutz HC, Beaulé PE, Dorey FJ, Le Duff MJ, Campbell PA, Gruen TA (2004) Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: two to six-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86(1):28–39. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200401000-00006 - DOI
-
- Langton DJ, Jameson SS, Joyce TJ, Hallab NJ, Natu S, Nargol AVF (2010) Early failure of metal-on-metal bearings in hip resurfacing and large-diameter total hip replacement: a consequence of excess wear. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92(1):38–46. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.92B1.22770 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical