Efficacy of Postoperative Radiographs After Intramedullary Nailing of the Tibia and Femur: When Are They Useful?
- PMID: 37285510
- PMCID: PMC10247209
- DOI: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-23-00069
Efficacy of Postoperative Radiographs After Intramedullary Nailing of the Tibia and Femur: When Are They Useful?
Abstract
Introduction: Postoperative radiographs are used to monitor fractures of the tibia and femur after intramedullary fixation. This study sought to examine how frequently these radiographs change management.
Methods: This was a single-center chart review of patients over a 4-year period at a level I trauma center. Radiographs were defined as either performed for routine surveillance or performed with some clinical correlate on history and examination. Participants received intramedullary nailing for diaphyseal fractures of the femur or tibia. Patients required at least one postoperative radiograph. All patients were subject to our institution's follow-up protocol: visits at 2, 6, 12, and 24 weeks. Radiographs that changed management were those that led to alterations in follow-up, directed counseling, or contributed to the decision to proceed with revision surgery.
Results: A total of 374 patients were found. Two hundred seventy-seven received at least one post-op radiograph. The median follow-up was 23 weeks. Six hundred seventeen total radiographs were reviewed. Nine radiographs contributed to a change in management (9/617 = 1.5%). No surveillance radiograph taken before 14 weeks resulted in changes in management.
Discussion: Our results suggest that radiographs taken in the first 3 months post-op in asymptomatic patients treated with lower extremity intramedullary rods do not result in changes to clinical management.
Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) in paediatric femur and tibia shaft fractures: Comparison between titanium and stainless steel nails.Injury. 2018 Nov;49 Suppl 3:S8-S11. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.09.049. Injury. 2018. PMID: 30415674
-
[Change in the procedure from external fixator to intramedullary nailing osteosynthesis of the femur and tibia].Aktuelle Traumatol. 1993 Jul;23 Suppl 1:21-35. Aktuelle Traumatol. 1993. PMID: 8104380 German.
-
Treatment of femoral and tibial diaphyseal nonunions using reamed intramedullary nailing without bone graft.Injury. 2008 Aug;39(8):952-9. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2008.02.024. Epub 2008 Jun 24. Injury. 2008. PMID: 18579143
-
[Borderline indications for locked intramedullary nailing of femur and tibia].Orthopade. 1996 Jun;25(3):234-46. Orthopade. 1996. PMID: 8766662 Review. German.
-
Controversies in the intramedullary nailing of proximal and distal tibia fractures.J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2014 Oct;22(10):665-73. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-22-10-665. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2014. PMID: 25281261 Review.
References
-
- American Association of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Position statement: In-office diagnostic imaging studies by orthopaedic surgeons. Published online February 2012. https://www.aaos.org/contentassets/6cd86858e5284f52a46585e52259e8ee/1132....
-
- Bell A, Templeman D, Weinlein JC: Nonunion of the femur and tibia: An update. Orthop Clin North Am 2016;47:365-375. - PubMed
-
- Nair S, Nambiar M, Pope A, Parkes M, De Jong K, Hau R: Intraoperative fluoroscopy alone versus routine post-operative X-rays in identifying return to theatre after fracture fixation. ANZ J Surg 2021;91:392-397. - PubMed
-
- Rupp M, Biehl C, Budak M, Thormann U, Heiss C, Alt V: Diaphyseal long bone nonunions - types, aetiology, economics, and treatment recommendations. Int Orthop 2018;42:247-258. - PubMed
-
- Tsang STJ, Mills LA, Frantzias J, Baren JP, Keating JF, Simpson AHRW: Exchange nailing for nonunion of diaphyseal fractures of the tibia. Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:534-541. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous