Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Aug;25(4):758-764.
doi: 10.1007/s11307-023-01830-9. Epub 2023 Jun 7.

Lymphoma-Sink Effect in Marginal Zone Lymphoma Based on CXCR4-Targeted Molecular Imaging

Affiliations

Lymphoma-Sink Effect in Marginal Zone Lymphoma Based on CXCR4-Targeted Molecular Imaging

Aleksander Kosmala et al. Mol Imaging Biol. 2023 Aug.

Abstract

Purpose: Recent studies investigating a tumor-sink effect in solid tumors reported on decreasing uptake in normal organs in patients with higher tumor burden. This phenomenon, however, has not been evaluated yet for theranostic radiotracers applied to hematological neoplasms. As such, we aimed to determine a potential "lymphoma-sink effect" in patients with marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) imaged with C-X-C motif chemokine receptor (CXCR) 4-directed PET/CTs.

Procedures: We retrospectively analyzed 73 patients with MZL who underwent CXCR4-directed [68Ga]Ga-PentixaFor PET/CT. Normal unaffected organ uptake (heart, liver, spleen, bone marrow, kidneys) was quantified using volumes of interests (VOIs) and mean standardized uptake values (SUVmean) were derived. MZL manifestations were also segmented to determine the maximum and peak standardized uptake values SUV (SUVmax/peak) and volumetric parameters, including lymphoma volume (LV), and fractional lymphoma activity (FLA, defined as LV*SUVmean of lymphoma burden). This approach resulted in 666 VOIs to capture the entire MZL manifestation load. We used Spearman's rank correlations to determine associations between organ uptake and CXCR4-expressing lymphoma lesions.

Results: We recorded the following median SUVmean in normal organs: heart, 1.82 (range, 0.78-4.11); liver, 1.35 (range, 0.72-2.99); bone marrow, 2.36 (range, 1.12-4.83); kidneys, 3.04 (range, 2.01-6.37); spleen, 5.79 (range, 2.07-10.5). No relevant associations between organ radiotracer uptake and MZL manifestation were observed, neither for SUVmax (ρ ≤ 0.21, P ≥ 0.07), SUVpeak (ρ ≤ 0.20, P ≥ 0.09), LV (ρ ≤ 0.13, P ≥ 0.27), nor FLA (ρ ≤ 0.15, P ≥ 0.33).

Conclusions: Investigating a lymphoma-sink effect in patients with hematological neoplasms, we observed no relevant associations between lymphoma burden and uptake in normal organs. Those observations may have therapeutic implications, e.g., for "cold" SDF1-pathway disrupting or "hot," CXCR4-directed radiolabeled drugs, as with higher lymphoma load, normal organ uptake seems to remain stable.

Keywords: C-X-C motif chemokine receptor; CXCR4; Lymphoma sink; PET; Radioligand therapy; Theranostics; Tumor sink; [68Ga]Ga-PentixaFor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

RAW and AKB have received speaker’s honoraria from PentixaPharm. AKB is a member of the advisory board of PentixaPharm. JD has received honoraria from Incyte, Morphosys and Stemline. All other authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Scatter plots of lymphoma-derived fractional lymphoma activity (FLA) and mean standardized uptake values (SUVmean) in normal (heart (a), bone marrow (b), liver (c), spleen (d), kidneys (e)) Squares are partially overlaid. No significance was reached
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Maximum intensity projections of [68Ga]Ga-PentixaFor PET/CT in patients with low (a lymphoma volume, 1.7 cm3), intermediate (b lymphoma volume, 66.2 cm3) and high (c lymphoma volume, 361.5 cm3) lymphoma load. Red arrows indicate lymphoma manifestations. Visually, no obvious differences in normal organ uptake are apparent between different patients, supporting the notion that in patients with high lymphoma manifestation burden, uptake in normal organs does not drop. H = Heart, L = Liver, K = Kidney, S = Spleen, BM = bone marrow

References

    1. Petit I, Jin D, Rafii S. The SDF-1-CXCR4 signaling pathway: a molecular hub modulating neo-angiogenesis. Trends Immunol. 2007;28:299–307. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2007.05.007. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stollberg S, Kammerer D, Neubauer E, et al. Differential somatostatin and CXCR4 chemokine receptor expression in MALT-type lymphoma of gastric and extragastric origin. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2016;142:2239–2247. doi: 10.1007/s00432-016-2220-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Duell J, Krummenast F, Schirbel A, et al. Improved primary staging of marginal-zone lymphoma by addition of CXCR4-directed PET/CT. J Nucl Med. 2021;62:1415–1421. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.120.257279. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Buck AK, Haug A, Dreher N, et al. Imaging of C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4 expression in 690 patients with solid or hematologic neoplasms using (68)Ga-Pentixafor PET. J Nucl Med. 2022;63:1687–1692. - PubMed
    1. Buck AK, Grigoleit GU, Kraus S, et al. C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4-targeted radioligand therapy in patients with advanced T-cell lymphoma. J Nucl Med. 2023;64:34–39. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.122.264207. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types