Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun 7;23(1):256.
doi: 10.1186/s12886-023-03001-4.

Evaluation of Schlemm's canal with swept-source optical coherence tomography in primary angle-closure disease

Affiliations

Evaluation of Schlemm's canal with swept-source optical coherence tomography in primary angle-closure disease

Xuming Ding et al. BMC Ophthalmol. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Purpose: To perform an in vivo evaluation of the changes in Schlemm's canal (SC) among patients with primary angle-closure disease (PACD) using swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT).

Methods: Patients diagnosed with PACD who had not undergone surgery were recruited. The SS-OCT quadrants scanned herein included the nasal and temporal sections at 3 and 9 o'clock, respectively. The diameter and cross-sectional area of the SC were measured. A linear mixed-effects model was performed to analyze the effects of parameters on the SC changes. The hypothesis of interest was related to the angle status (iridotrabecular contact, ITC/open angle, OPN), which was further explored with pairwise comparisons of the estimated marginal means (EMMs) of the SC diameter and SC area. In the ITC regions, the relationship between the trabecular-iris contact length (TICL) percentage and SC parameters was also studied by a mixed model.

Results: A total of 49 eyes of 35 patients were included for measurements and analysis. The percentage of observable SCs in the ITC regions was only 58.5% (24/41), whereas it was 86.0% (49/57) in the OPN regions (χ2 = 9.44, p = 0.002). ITC was significantly associated with a decreasing SC size. The EMMs for the diameter and cross-sectional area of SC at the ITC and OPN regions were 203.34 μm versus 261.41 μm (p = 0.006) and 3174.43 μm2 versus 5347.63 μm2 (p = 0.022), respectively. Sex, age, spherical equivalent refraction, intraocular pressure, axial length, extent of angle closure, history of acute attack and treatment with LPI were not significantly associated with SC parameters. In the ITC regions, a larger TICL percentage was significantly associated with a decrease in SC diameter and area (p = 0.003 and 0.019, respectively).

Conclusions: The morphologies of SC could be affected by the angle status (ITC/OPN) in patients with PACD, and ITC was significantly associated with a decreasing SC size. These changes in SC as described by OCT scans might help to elucidate the progression mechanisms of PACD.

Keywords: Iridotrabecular contact; Optical coherence tomography; Primary angle closure disease; Schlemm’s canal.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
A the nasal scan location (3 o’clock) within the right eye was explored by a 3-mm line-scanning model. B a SS-OCT B-scan of the nasal iridocorneal angle showing iridotrabecular contact (ITC), the scleral spur (SS, red arrow), Schlemm’s canal (SC, white arrow), the termination of the Descemet membrane (Schwalbe line, SL, yellow arrow) and trabecular meshwork length (TML, distance between SS and SL). C the image of C was made from the dotted box area in B presenting the SC diameter (length of the white double-headed arrow), SC cross-sectional area (SCA, yellow dotted enclosed area), TICL = trabecular-iris contact length (length of the blue double-headed arrow)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Boundary of SC was sketched out as the yellow curve. TML = trabecular meshwork length (the red double-headed arrow); TICL = trabecular-iris contact length (the blue double-headed arrow)

References

    1. Quigley HA, Broman AT. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90(3):262–267. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2005.081224. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thomas R, George R, Parikh R, Muliyil J, Jacob A. Five year risk of progression of primary angle closure suspects to primary angle closure: a population based study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003;87(4):450–454. doi: 10.1136/bjo.87.4.450. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thomas R, Parikh R, Muliyil J, Kumar RS. Five-year risk of progression of primary angle closure to primary angle closure glaucoma: a population-based study. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2003;81(5):480–485. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0420.2003.00135.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wright C, Tawfik MA, Waisbourd M, Katz LJ. Primary angle-closure glaucoma: an update. Acta Ophthalmol. 2016;94(3):217–225. doi: 10.1111/aos.12784. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Grant WM. Clinical measurements of aqueous outflow. Am J Ophthalmol. 1951;34(11):1603–1605. - PubMed