Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 May 4;15(5):e38519.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.38519. eCollection 2023 May.

Formative Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) as an Assessment Tool in UK Undergraduate Medical Education: A Review of Its Utility

Affiliations
Review

Formative Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) as an Assessment Tool in UK Undergraduate Medical Education: A Review of Its Utility

Khalid Al-Hashimi et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) is a globally established clinical examination; it is often considered the gold standard in evaluating clinical competence within medicine and other healthcare professionals' educations alike. The OSCE consists of a circuit of multiple stations testing a multitude of clinical competencies expected of undergraduate students at certain levels throughout training. Despite its widespread use, the evidence regarding formative renditions of the examination in medical training is highly variable; thus, its suitability as an assessment has been challenged for various reasons. Classically, Van Der Vleuten's formula of utility has been adopted in the appraisal of assessment methods as means of testing, including the OSCE. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the literature surrounding the formative use of OSCEs in undergraduate medical training, whilst specifically focusing on the constituents of the equation and means of mitigating factors that compromise its objectivity.

Keywords: clinical competency; clinical skills assessment; formative assessments; objective structured clinical examination (osce); undergraduate medical education.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

    1. Assessment methods in medical education. Tabish S. https://ijhs.qu.edu.sa/index.php/journal/article/view/44 Int J Health Sci. 2008;2:3–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wood D. Understanding medical education: evidence, theory, and practice (3rd edition) Vol. 3. New Jersey, USA: Wiley Blackwell; 2018. Formative assessment; pp. 361–373.
    1. Developing a national patient safety education framework for Australia. Walton MM, Shaw T, Barnet S, Ross J. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006;15:437–442. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Research in medical education: three decades of progress. Norman G. BMJ. 2002;324:1560–1562. - PMC - PubMed
    1. How to develop a competency-based examination blueprint for longitudinal standardized patient clinical skills assessments. Mookherjee S, Chang A, Boscardin CK, Hauer KE. Med Teach. 2013;35:883–890. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources