Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul-Aug;39(4):328-335.
doi: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000002264. Epub 2023 Jun 6.

Orbital Artifacts on MRI

Khizar Rana  1 , Valerie Juniat  1 , Sandy Patel  2 , Greg Avey  3 , Mark J Lucarelli  4 , Dinesh Selva  1   2
Affiliations

Orbital Artifacts on MRI

Khizar Rana et al. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

Purpose: To describe artifacts on orbital MRI, which led to an incorrect radiology report.

Methods: Retrospective chart review of patients identified from the orbital databases at the Royal Adelaide Hospital and University of Wisconsin Hospital. Patients who had artifacts on orbital MRI that led to an incorrect radiology report were included. Records were evaluated for age at imaging, gender, MRI sequence, laterality, and location of artifact, radiological characteristics and misdiagnosis, and cause of artifact.

Results: Data were collected from 7 patients (3 male) who had a median age of 61 years at the time of imaging. Five artifacts resulted from fat-suppression failure with 4 of these cases misdiagnosed as inflammatory changes and 1 misdiagnosed as neoplastic infiltration. The OD was involved in 4 cases. Six cases were in the inferior orbit region.

Conclusions: Fat-suppression failure artifacts may arise in the inferior orbit region and can be mistaken for inflammatory or neoplastic orbital disease. This may prompt additional investigations such as orbital biopsy. Clinicians should be aware of artifacts which can affect orbital MRI and lead to potential misdiagnosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no financial or conflicts of interest to disclose.

References

    1. Anzai Y, Lufkin RB, Jabour BA, et al. Fat-suppression failure artifacts simulating pathology on frequency-selective fat-suppression MR images of the head and neck. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1992;13:879–884.
    1. Borges AR, Lufkin RB, Huang AY, et al. Frequency-selective fat suppression MR imaging. Localized asymmetric failure of fat suppression mimicking orbital disease. J Neuroophthalmol. 1997;17:12–17.
    1. Herrick RC, Hayman LA, Taber KH, et al. Artifacts and pitfalls in MR imaging of the orbit: a clinical review. Radiographics. 1997;17:707–724.
    1. Varma DR, Ponnaganti S, Dandu RV. Beware of artifacts in orbital magnetic resonance imaging. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020;68:2516–2518.
    1. Brown BA, Swallow CE, Eiseman AS. MRI artifact masquerading as orbital disease. Int Ophthalmol. 2001;24:343–347.

LinkOut - more resources