Return on investment of workplace-based prevention interventions: a systematic review
- PMID: 37290417
- PMCID: PMC10393479
- DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckad092
Return on investment of workplace-based prevention interventions: a systematic review
Abstract
Background: Occupational Safety and Health is an important public health topic. Many employers may regard health promotion or prevention initiatives as an additional cost with few benefits. The aim of this systematic review is to identify the studies conducted on the return on investment (ROI) of preventive health interventions conducted within workplaces, and to describe their designs, topics and calculation methods.
Methods: We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Science Direct, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, International Labour Organization and Occupational Safety and Health Administration from 2013 to 2021. We included studies that evaluated prevention interventions in the workplace setting and reported an economic outcome or company-related benefits. We report the findings according to PRISMA reporting guidelines.
Results: We included 141 articles reporting 138 interventions. Of them, 62 (44.9%) had an experimental design, 29 (21.0%) had a quasi-experimental design, 37 (26.8%) were observational studies and 10 (7.2%) were modelling studies. The interventions' objectives were mostly related to psychosocial risks (N = 42; 30.4%), absenteeism (N = 40; 29.0%), general health (N = 35; 25.4%), specific diseases (N = 31; 22.5%), nutrition (N = 24; 17.4%), sedentarism (N = 21; 15.2%) musculoskeletal disorders (N = 17; 12.3%) and accidents (N = 14; 10.1%). The ROI calculation was positive for 78 interventions (56.5%), negative for 12 (8.7%), neutral for 13 (9.4%) and undetermined for 35 (25.4%).
Conclusion: There were many different ROI calculations. Most studies have a positive result but randomized controlled trials have fewer positive results than other designs. It is important to conduct more high-quality studies so that results can inform employers and policy-makers.
© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association.
Figures
Similar articles
-
The relationship between return on investment and quality of study methodology in workplace health promotion programs.Am J Health Promot. 2014 Jul-Aug;28(6):347-63. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.130731-LIT-395. Am J Health Promot. 2014. PMID: 24977496 Review.
-
A return-on-investment simulation model of workplace obesity interventions.J Occup Environ Med. 2009 Jul;51(7):751-8. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e3181a86656. J Occup Environ Med. 2009. PMID: 19528833
-
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12. Early Hum Dev. 2020. PMID: 33036834
-
Economic evaluations of interventions against influenza at workplaces: systematic review.Occup Med (Lond). 2022 Feb 22;72(2):70-80. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqab163. Occup Med (Lond). 2022. PMID: 34931675
-
A Scoping Review of Economic Evaluations of Workplace Wellness Programs.Public Health Rep. 2021 Nov-Dec;136(6):671-684. doi: 10.1177/0033354920976557. Epub 2021 Feb 4. Public Health Rep. 2021. PMID: 33541206 Free PMC article.
References
-
- European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA). Third European Survey of Enterprises on New and Emerging Risks (ESENER 3) [Internet]. November 2019: 15. Available at: https://osha.europa.eu/en/publications/third-european-survey-enterprises... (15 juill 2021, date last accessed).
-
- Khushalani JS, Song S, Calhoun BH, et al. Preventing leading causes of death: systematic review of cost-utility literature. Am J Prev Med 2022;62:275–84. - PubMed
-
- Mühlberger N, Sroczynski G, Gogollari A, et al. Cost effectiveness of breast cancer screening and prevention: a systematic review with a focus on risk-adapted strategies. Eur J Health Econ 2021;22:1311–44. - PubMed