Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Aug 1;33(4):612-618.
doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckad092.

Return on investment of workplace-based prevention interventions: a systematic review

Affiliations

Return on investment of workplace-based prevention interventions: a systematic review

Frédérique Thonon et al. Eur J Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Occupational Safety and Health is an important public health topic. Many employers may regard health promotion or prevention initiatives as an additional cost with few benefits. The aim of this systematic review is to identify the studies conducted on the return on investment (ROI) of preventive health interventions conducted within workplaces, and to describe their designs, topics and calculation methods.

Methods: We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Science Direct, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, International Labour Organization and Occupational Safety and Health Administration from 2013 to 2021. We included studies that evaluated prevention interventions in the workplace setting and reported an economic outcome or company-related benefits. We report the findings according to PRISMA reporting guidelines.

Results: We included 141 articles reporting 138 interventions. Of them, 62 (44.9%) had an experimental design, 29 (21.0%) had a quasi-experimental design, 37 (26.8%) were observational studies and 10 (7.2%) were modelling studies. The interventions' objectives were mostly related to psychosocial risks (N = 42; 30.4%), absenteeism (N = 40; 29.0%), general health (N = 35; 25.4%), specific diseases (N = 31; 22.5%), nutrition (N = 24; 17.4%), sedentarism (N = 21; 15.2%) musculoskeletal disorders (N = 17; 12.3%) and accidents (N = 14; 10.1%). The ROI calculation was positive for 78 interventions (56.5%), negative for 12 (8.7%), neutral for 13 (9.4%) and undetermined for 35 (25.4%).

Conclusion: There were many different ROI calculations. Most studies have a positive result but randomized controlled trials have fewer positive results than other designs. It is important to conduct more high-quality studies so that results can inform employers and policy-makers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of selected articles
Figure 2
Figure 2
Number of publications per year and study design
Figure 3
Figure 3
Interventions’ objectives by number

Similar articles

References

    1. Wang Y, Chen H, Liu B, et al. A systematic review on the research progress and evolving trends of occupational health and safety management: a bibliometric analysis of mapping knowledge domains. Front Public Health 2020;8:81. - PMC - PubMed
    1. European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA). Third European Survey of Enterprises on New and Emerging Risks (ESENER 3) [Internet]. November 2019: 15. Available at: https://osha.europa.eu/en/publications/third-european-survey-enterprises... (15 juill 2021, date last accessed).
    1. Khushalani JS, Song S, Calhoun BH, et al. Preventing leading causes of death: systematic review of cost-utility literature. Am J Prev Med 2022;62:275–84. - PubMed
    1. Myran DT, Morton R, Biggs BA, et al. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening for and vaccination against hepatitis B virus among migrants in the EU/EEA: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2018;15:1898. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mühlberger N, Sroczynski G, Gogollari A, et al. Cost effectiveness of breast cancer screening and prevention: a systematic review with a focus on risk-adapted strategies. Eur J Health Econ 2021;22:1311–44. - PubMed

Publication types