Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jun;8(6):e012450.
doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012450.

Addressing the challenges of implementing evidence-based prioritisation in global health

Affiliations
Review

Addressing the challenges of implementing evidence-based prioritisation in global health

David T S Hayman et al. BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Jun.

Abstract

Global health requires evidence-based approaches to improve health and decrease inequalities. In a roundtable discussion between health practitioners, funders, academics and policy-makers, we recognised key areas for improvement to deliver better-informed, sustainable and equitable global health practices. These focus on considering information-sharing mechanisms and developing evidence-based frameworks that take an adaptive function-based approach, grounded in the ability to perform and respond to prioritised needs. Increasing social engagement as well as sector and participant diversity in whole-of-society decision-making, and collaborating with and optimising on hyperlocal and global regional entities, will improve prioritisation of global health capabilities. Since the skills required to navigate drivers of pandemics, and the challenges in prioritising, capacity building and response do not sit squarely in the health sector, it is essential to integrate expertise from a broad range of fields to maximise on available knowledge during decision-making and system development. Here, we review the current assessment tools and provide seven discussion points for how improvements to implementation of evidence-based prioritisation can improve global health.

Keywords: environmental health; health policy; health systems evaluation; public health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

References

    1. Wenham C. The Oversecuritization of global health: changing the terms of debate. Int Aff 2019;95:1093–110. 10.1093/ia/iiz170 - DOI
    1. Whitmee S, Haines A, Beyrer C, et al. . Safeguarding human health in the Anthropocene epoch: report of the Rockefeller foundation–Lancet Commission on planetary health. Lancet 2015;386:1973–2028. 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60901-1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. One Health High-Level Expert Panel (OHHLEP), Adisasmito WB, Almuhairi S, et al. . One health: A new definition for a sustainable and healthy future. PLoS Pathog 2022;18:e1010537. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1010537 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Adisasmito WB, Almuhairi S, Barton Behravesh C, et al. . One health action for health security and equity. Lancet 2023;401:530–3. 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00086-7 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zinsstag J, Kaiser-Grolimund A, Heitz-Tokpa K, et al. . Advancing one human–animal–environment health for global health security: What does the evidence say. Lancet 2023;401:591–604. 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01595-1 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types