Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun 8;13(1):9355.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-36601-7.

Short-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic gastrectomy with articulating instruments for gastric cancer compared with the robotic approach

Affiliations

Short-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic gastrectomy with articulating instruments for gastric cancer compared with the robotic approach

Chang Min Lee et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

To overcome the limitations of laparoscopic surgery, robotic systems have been commonly used in the era of minimally invasive surgery despite their high cost. However, the articulation of instruments can be achieved without a robotic system at lower cost using articulating laparoscopic instruments (ALIs). Between May 2021 and May 2022, perioperative outcomes following laparoscopic gastrectomy using ALIs versus robotic gastrectomy were compared. A total of 88 patients underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy using ALIs, while 96 underwent robotic gastrectomy. Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups except for a higher proportion of patients with a medical history in the ALI group (p = 0.013). Clinicopathologic and perioperative outcomes were not significantly different between the groups. However, the operation time was significantly shorter in the ALI group (p = 0.026). No deaths occurred in either group. In conclusion, laparoscopic gastrectomy using ALIs was associated with comparable perioperative surgical outcomes and a shorter operation time compared to robotic gastrectomy in this prospective cohort study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient flow diagram. Of the 250 patients who underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancer during the 1-year study period, 66 patients met the exclusion criteria and were therefore excluded from the study. The remaining 184 patients included 88 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery using ALIs and 96 who underwent robotic surgery. ALI, articulating laparoscopic instrument.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Articulating function for supra-pancreatic lymph node dissection. (a) Overview of the fenestrated forceps and medium-large clip applier. (b) Snapshot of the 12a area lymph node dissection using ALI. (c) Lifting lymph nodes without disturbing the movement of the energy device is necessary. Dissection of the 11p area also requires upward traction of the lymph nodes creating space for the approaching energy devices. The same applies to robots adequately exposing the deep-seated 12a (d) and 11p (e) tissues. CHA, common hepatic artery; PV, portal vein; SA, splenic artery; SV, splenic vein; LN, lymph node.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kim YW, et al. Improved quality of life outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: Results of a prospective randomized clinical trial. Ann. Surg. 2008;248:721–727. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318185e62e. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Huscher CG, et al. Laparoscopic versus open subtotal gastrectomy for distal gastric cancer: Five-year results of a randomized prospective trial. Ann. Surg. 2005;241:232–237. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000151892.35922.f2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kim HH, et al. Morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: An interim report—a phase III multicenter, prospective, randomized Trial (KLASS Trial) Ann. Surg. 2010;251:417–420. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181cc8f6b. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Strong VE. Defining the role of laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2014;32:613–614. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.52.9479. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Information Committee of the Korean Gastric Cancer, A Korean gastric cancer association-led nationwide survey on surgically treated gastric cancers in 2019. J. Gastric Cancer. 2021;21:221–235. doi: 10.5230/jgc.2021.21.e27. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types