Interfacility Transfer of Uninsured vs Insured Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in California
- PMID: 37294567
- PMCID: PMC10257096
- DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.17831
Interfacility Transfer of Uninsured vs Insured Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in California
Erratum in
-
Error in Methods Section.JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jul 3;6(7):e2326207. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.26207. JAMA Netw Open. 2023. PMID: 37450307 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Abstract
Importance: Insurance status has been associated with whether patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) presenting to emergency departments are transferred to other facilities, but whether the facility's percutaneous coronary intervention capabilities mediate this association is unknown.
Objective: To examine whether uninsured patients with STEMI were more likely than patients with insurance to experience interfacility transfer.
Design, setting, and participants: This observational cohort study compared patients with STEMI with and without insurance who presented to California emergency departments between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2019, using the Patient Discharge Database and Emergency Department Discharge Database from the California Department of Health Care Access and Information. Statistical analyses were completed in April 2023.
Exposures: Primary exposures were lack of insurance and facility percutaneous coronary intervention capabilities.
Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was transfer status from the presenting emergency department of a percutaneous coronary intervention-capable hospital, defined as a facility performing 36 percutaneous coronary interventions per year. Multivariable logistic regression models with multiple robustness checks were performed to determine the association of insurance status with the odds of transfer.
Results: This study included 135 358 patients with STEMI, of whom 32 841 patients (24.2%) were transferred (mean [SD] age, 64 [14] years; 10 100 women [30.8%]; 2542 Asian individuals [7.7%]; 2053 Black individuals [6.3%]; 8285 Hispanic individuals [25.2%]; 18 650 White individuals [56.8%]). After adjusting for time trends, patient factors, and transferring hospital characteristics (including percutaneous coronary intervention capabilities), patients who were uninsured had lower odds of experiencing interfacility transfer than those with insurance (adjusted odds ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.88-0.98; P = .01).
Conclusions and relevance: After accounting for a facility's percutaneous coronary intervention capabilities, lack of insurance was associated with lower odds of emergency department transfer for patients with STEMI. These findings warrant further investigation to understand the characteristics of facilities and outcomes for uninsured patients with STEMI.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures


Similar articles
-
Initial treatment of uninsured patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction by facility percutaneous coronary intervention capabilities.Acad Emerg Med. 2024 Feb;31(2):119-128. doi: 10.1111/acem.14831. Epub 2023 Nov 27. Acad Emerg Med. 2024. PMID: 37921055 Free PMC article.
-
Role of Health Insurance Status in Interfacility Transfers of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.Am J Cardiol. 2016 Aug 1;118(3):332-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.05.007. Epub 2016 May 14. Am J Cardiol. 2016. PMID: 27282834 Free PMC article.
-
Examining the Timeliness of ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction Transfers.West J Emerg Med. 2021 Feb 15;22(2):319-325. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2020.8.47770. West J Emerg Med. 2021. PMID: 33856318 Free PMC article.
-
Regional "Call 911" Emergency Department Protocol to Reduce Interfacility Transfer Delay for Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Dec 23;6(12):e006898. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.006898. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017. PMID: 29275369 Free PMC article.
-
Paramedic Interventions and Adverse Patient Events during Prolonged Interfacility Ground Transport in a "Drip and Ship" Pharmacoinvasive Model of STEMI Care.Prehosp Emerg Care. 2024;28(2):375-380. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2023.2179707. Epub 2023 Mar 9. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2024. PMID: 36794866 Review.
Cited by
-
2025 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics: A Report of US and Global Data From the American Heart Association.Circulation. 2025 Feb 25;151(8):e41-e660. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001303. Epub 2025 Jan 27. Circulation. 2025. PMID: 39866113 Review.
-
Impact of Hispanic Ethnicity, Geography, and Insurance Status on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.JACC Adv. 2025 May;4(5):101723. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101723. Epub 2025 Apr 26. JACC Adv. 2025. PMID: 40288082 Free PMC article.
-
Error in Methods Section.JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jul 3;6(7):e2326207. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.26207. JAMA Netw Open. 2023. PMID: 37450307 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Trends in Patient Transfers From Overall and Caseload-Strained US Hospitals During the COVID-19 Pandemic.JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Feb 5;7(2):e2356174. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.56174. JAMA Netw Open. 2024. PMID: 38358739 Free PMC article.
-
Initial treatment of uninsured patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction by facility percutaneous coronary intervention capabilities.Acad Emerg Med. 2024 Feb;31(2):119-128. doi: 10.1111/acem.14831. Epub 2023 Nov 27. Acad Emerg Med. 2024. PMID: 37921055 Free PMC article.
References
-
- O’Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, et al. ; American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines . 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2013;127(4):e362-e425. doi:10.1161/CIR.0b013e3182742c84 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous