Diagnostic Utility of Hysteroscopic Biopsy in Cases of Suspected Lobular Endocervical Glandular Hyperplasia and Comparison with Cervical Conization
- PMID: 37297759
- PMCID: PMC10252663
- DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11111619
Diagnostic Utility of Hysteroscopic Biopsy in Cases of Suspected Lobular Endocervical Glandular Hyperplasia and Comparison with Cervical Conization
Abstract
Background: Cervical cystic lesions encompass a range of benign and malignant pathologies. Magnetic resonance imaging or cytology alone cannot provide a definitive diagnosis, and conventional practice involves performing a cervical biopsy by conization to confirm the histology in cases exhibiting potential signs of lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia (LEGH) or malignancy. However, as postoperative complications resulting from conization can impact future fertility and pregnancy, alternative diagnostic methods are needed for reproductive-age patients. This study aimed to establish the efficacy of a hysteroscopic biopsy for diagnosing cervical cystic lesions and compare it with conization.
Methods: Thirteen patients with cervical cystic lesions suspected of LEGH or malignancy underwent a hysteroscopic biopsy, while 23 underwent conization. Patient background information, preoperative evaluation, histology, and postoperative outcomes were collected and compared retrospectively.
Results: No significant differences were found between the hysteroscopy and conization groups in terms of mean patient age (45 vs. 48 years), operating time (23 vs. 35 min), blood loss (small amount vs. 43 mL), and postoperative hospitalization (1.1 vs. 1.6 days).
Conclusion: A hysteroscopic biopsy allows for targeted resection of the cervix while maintaining diagnostic accuracy. It may serve as an efficient method for diagnosing cervical cystic lesions.
Keywords: conization; hysteroscopic biopsy; lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures



References
-
- Nucci M.R., Clement P.B., Young R.H. Lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia, not otherwise specified: A clinicopathologic analysis of thirteen cases of a distinctive pseudoneoplastic lesion and comparison with fourteen cases of adenoma malignum. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 1999;23:886–891. doi: 10.1097/00000478-199908000-00005. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Mikami Y., Kiyokawa T., Hata S., Fujiwara K., Moriya T., Sasano H., Manabe T., Akahira J., Ito K., Tase T., et al. Gastrointestinal immunophenotype in adenocarcinomas of the uterine cervix and related glandular lesions: A possible link between lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia/pyloric gland metaplasia and ‘adenoma malignum’. Mod. Pathol. 2004;17:962–972. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.3800148. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Takatsu A., Miyamoto T., Fuseya C., Suzuki A., Kashima H., Horiuchi A., Ishii K., Shiozawa T. Clonality analysis suggests that STK11 gene mutations are involved in progression of lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia (LEGH) to minimal deviation adenocarcinoma (MDA) Virchows Arch. 2013;462:645–651. doi: 10.1007/s00428-013-1417-1. - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources