Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun 5;11(11):1649.
doi: 10.3390/healthcare11111649.

Health Utilities of Bilateral Severe-to-Profound Hearing Loss with Assistive Devices

Affiliations

Health Utilities of Bilateral Severe-to-Profound Hearing Loss with Assistive Devices

Yi-Wen Chen et al. Healthcare (Basel). .

Abstract

Hearing loss is a common sensory disorder in newborns. Early intervention with assistive devices benefits children's auditory and speech performance. This study aimed to measure the health utilities of children with bilateral severe-to-profound hearing impairment with different assistive devices. The descriptions of four hypothetical health states were developed, and their utility values were obtained from healthcare professionals via the visual analogue scale (VAS) and time trade-off (TTO) methods. Thirty-seven healthcare professionals completed the TTO interview and were included in the analysis. The mean utility scores obtained via VAS were 0.31 for no assistive devices, 0.41 for bilateral hearing aids, 0.63 for bimodal hearing, and 0.82 for bilateral cochlear implants. As for the utility scores obtained via TTO, mean values were 0.60, 0.69, 0.81, and 0.90, respectively. None of the four groups had the same VAS- or TTO-elicited utility (p < 0.001). The post hoc test results showed that the difference was significant between any two groups (all p < 0.05). In conclusion, this study elicited health utility of bilateral hearing impairment with different assistive devices using the VAS and TTO methods. The utility values obtained provide critical data for future cost-utility analysis and health technology assessment.

Keywords: cochlear implants; health utility; hearing impairment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of study design.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Espeso A., Owens D., Williams G. The diagnosis of hearing loss in children: Common presentations and investigations. Curr. Paediatr. 2006;16:484–488. doi: 10.1016/j.cupe.2006.08.012. - DOI
    1. Shan A., Ting J.S., Price C., Goman A.M., Willink A., Reed N.S., Nieman C.L. Hearing loss and employment: A systematic review of the association between hearing loss and employment among adults. J. Laryngol. Otol. 2020;134:387–397. doi: 10.1017/S0022215120001012. - DOI - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization . Childhood Hearing Loss: Strategies for Prevention and Care. World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzerland: 2016.
    1. Yoshinaga-Itano C., Sedey A.L., Wiggin M., Mason C.A. Language Outcomes Improved Through Early Hearing Detection and Earlier Cochlear Implantation. Otol. Neurotol. 2018;39:1256–1263. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001976. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Niparko J.K., Tobey E.A., Thal D.J., Eisenberg L.S., Wang N.-Y., Quittner A.L., Fink N.E., CDaCI Investigative Team Spoken language development in children following cochlear implantation. JAMA. 2010;303:1498–1506. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.451. - DOI - PMC - PubMed