Systematic Review on S-ICD Lead Extraction
- PMID: 37297905
- PMCID: PMC10254059
- DOI: 10.3390/jcm12113710
Systematic Review on S-ICD Lead Extraction
Abstract
Background and purpose: Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillators (S-ICDs) have emerged in recent years as a valid alternative to traditional transvenous ICDs (TV-ICDs). Therefore, the number of S-ICD implantations is rising, leading to a consequent increase in S-ICD-related complications sometimes requiring complete device removal. Thus, the aim of this systematic review is to gather all the available literature on S-ICD lead extraction (SLE), with particular reference to the type of indication, techniques, complications and success rate.
Methods: Studies were identified by searching electronic databases (Medline via PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science) from inception to 21 November 2022. The search strategy adopted was developed using the following key words: subcutaneous, S-ICD, defibrillator, ICD, extraction, explantation. Studies were included if they met both of the following criteria: (1) inclusion of patients with S-ICD; (2) inclusion of patients who underwent SLE.
Results: Our literature search identified 238 references. Based on the abstract evaluation, 38 of these citations were considered potentially eligible for inclusion, and their full texts were analyzed. We excluded 8 of these studies because no SLE was performed. Eventually, 30 studies were included, with 207 patients who underwent SLE. Overall, the majority of SLEs were performed for non-infective causes (59.90%). Infection of the device (affecting either the lead or the pocket) was the cause of SLE in 38.65% of cases. Indication data were not available in 3/207 cases. The mean dwelling time was 14 months. SLEs were performed using manual traction or with the aid of a tool designed for transvenous lead extraction (TLE), including either a rotational or non-powered mechanical dilator sheath.
Conclusions: SLE is performed mainly for non-infective causes. Techniques vary greatly across different studies. Dedicated tools for SLE might be developed in the future and standard approaches should be defined. In the meantime, authors are encouraged to share their experience and data to further refine the existing variegated approaches.
Keywords: ICD; S-ICD; explantation; extraction; infection; subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Zeppenfeld K., Tfelt-Hansen J., de Riva M., Winkel B.G., Behr E.R., Blom N.A., Charron P., Corrado D., Dagres N., de Chillou C., et al. 2022 ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death. Eur. Heart J. 2022;43:3997–4126. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac262. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Olde Nordkamp L.R., Postema P.G., Knops R.E., van Dijk N., Limpens J., Wilde A.A., de Groot J.R. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator harm in young patients with inherited arrhythmia syndromes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of inappropriate shocks and complications. Heart Rhythm. 2016;13:443–454. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.09.010. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Sacher F., Probst V., Maury P., Babuty D., Mansourati J., Komatsu Y., Marquie C., Rosa A., Diallo A., Cassagneau R., et al. Outcome after implantation of a cardioverter-defibrillator in patients with Brugada syndrome: A multicenter study—Part 2. Circulation. 2018;128:1739–1747. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.001941. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
