Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May 29;12(11):2138.
doi: 10.3390/plants12112138.

Physicochemical Characteristics and Microstructure of Ancient and Common Wheat Grains Cultivated in Romania

Affiliations

Physicochemical Characteristics and Microstructure of Ancient and Common Wheat Grains Cultivated in Romania

Camelia Maria Golea et al. Plants (Basel). .

Abstract

Different wheat species, common wheat (Triticum aestivum subsp. aestivum), spelt (Triticum aestivum subsp. spelta) and einkorn (Triticum monococcum subsp. monococcum), were analyzed for physicochemical (moisture, ash, protein, wet gluten, lipid, starch, carbohydrates, test weight and thousand-kernel mass) and mineral elements (Ca, Mg, K, Na, Zn, Fe, Mn and Cu) concentrations in grains. Additionally, wheat grain microstructure was determined using a scanning electron microscope. SEM micrographs of wheat grains show that einkorn has smaller type A starch granule diameters and more compact protein bonds compared to common wheat and spelt grains, making it easier to digest. The ancient wheat grains presented higher values for ash, protein, wet gluten and lipid content compared to the common wheat grains, whereas the carbohydrates and starch content were significantly (p < 0.05) lower. The mean values showed that spelt (Triticum aestivum subsp. spelta) grains presented the highest values for Ca, Mg and K, while einkorn (Triticum monococcum subsp. monococcum) grains had the highest values for the microelements Zn, Mn and Cu. The highest values of Fe were recorded for common wheat varieties whereas no significant differences among the species were obtained for Na content. The principal component analysis (p > 0.05) between wheat flours characteristics showed a close association between wheat grain species and between the chemical characteristics of gluten and protein content (r = 0.994), lipid and ash content (r = 0.952) and starch and carbohydrate content (r = 0.927), for which high positive significant correlations (p < 0.05) were obtained. Taking into account that Romania is the fourth largest wheat producer at the European level, this study is of great global importance. According to the results obtained, the ancient species have higher nutritional value from the point of view of chemical compounds and macro elements of minerals. This may be of great importance for consumers who demand bakery products with high nutritional quality.

Keywords: grain microstructure; minerals; principal component analysis; proximate composition; wheat.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
SEM micrographs of wheat caryopsis characteristic to the following species: common wheat (A) and einkorn (B). P—pericarp; SC—seed coat; A—aleurone layer; E—starchy endosperm.
Figure 2
Figure 2
SEM micrograph of the aleurone layer (A) characteristic to einkorn: G—protein body globoids of the aleurone layer.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) micrographs of the endosperm of wheat samples: (A) common wheat; (B) einkorn; (C) spelt.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) micrographs of the endosperm of wheat samples: (A) common wheat; (B) einkorn; (C) spelt.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) micrographs of the endosperm of wheat samples: (A) common wheat; (B) einkorn; (C) spelt.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Principal component analysis between wheat flour characteristics.

References

    1. Mitura K., Cacak-Pietrzak G., Feledyn-Szewczyk B., Szablewski T., Studnicki M. Yield and Grain Quality of Common Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Depending on the Different Farming Systems (Organic vs. Integrated vs. Conventional) Plants. 2023;12:1022. doi: 10.3390/plants12051022. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cappelli A., Cini E. Challenges and Opportunities in Wheat Flour, Pasta, Bread, and Bakery Product Production Chains: A Systematic Review of Innovations and Improvement Strategies to Increase Sustainability, Productivity, and Product Quality. Sustainability. 2021;13:2608. doi: 10.3390/su13052608. - DOI
    1. Rasheed F., Markgren J., Hedenqvist M., Johansson E. Modeling to Understand Plant Protein Structure-Function Relationships—Implications for Seed Storage Proteins. Molecules. 2020;25:873. doi: 10.3390/molecules25040873. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baillière J., Laureys D., Vermeir P., Van Opstaele F., De Rouck G., De Cooman L., Vanderputten D., De Clippeleer J. 10 Unmalted Alternative Cereals and Pseudocereals: A Comparative Analysis of Their Characteristics Relevant to the Brewing Process. J. Cereal Sci. 2022;106:103482. doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2022.103482. - DOI
    1. Marzocchi S., Caboni M.F., Miani M.G., Pasini F. Wheat Germ and Lipid Oxidation: An Open Issue. Foods. 2022;11:1032. doi: 10.3390/foods11071032. - DOI - PMC - PubMed