Trends and Challenges in AIoT/IIoT/IoT Implementation
- PMID: 37299800
- PMCID: PMC10255551
- DOI: 10.3390/s23115074
Trends and Challenges in AIoT/IIoT/IoT Implementation
Abstract
For the next coming years, metaverse, digital twin and autonomous vehicle applications are the leading technologies for many complex applications hitherto inaccessible such as health and life sciences, smart home, smart agriculture, smart city, smart car and logistics, Industry 4.0, entertainment (video game) and social media applications, due to recent tremendous developments in process modeling, supercomputing, cloud data analytics (deep learning, etc.), communication network and AIoT/IIoT/IoT technologies. AIoT/IIoT/IoT is a crucial research field because it provides the essential data to fuel metaverse, digital twin, real-time Industry 4.0 and autonomous vehicle applications. However, the science of AIoT is inherently multidisciplinary, and therefore, it is difficult for readers to understand its evolution and impacts. Our main contribution in this article is to analyze and highlight the trends and challenges of the AIoT technology ecosystem including core hardware (MCU, MEMS/NEMS sensors and wireless access medium), core software (operating system and protocol communication stack) and middleware (deep learning on a microcontroller: TinyML). Two low-powered AI technologies emerge: TinyML and neuromorphic computing, but only one AIoT/IIoT/IoT device implementation using TinyML dedicated to strawberry disease detection as a case study. So far, despite the very rapid progress of AIoT/IIoT/IoT technologies, several challenges remain to be overcome such as safety, security, latency, interoperability and reliability of sensor data, which are essential characteristics to meet the requirements of metaverse, digital twin, autonomous vehicle and Industry 4.0. applications.
Keywords: AIoT platform; ANN; IMC; Keras; OpenThread; SNN; TensorFlow; TensorFlow Lite; TensorFlow for microcontroller; TinyML; Zephyr; digital twin; metaverse; neuromorphic computing.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Mylonas G., Kalogeras A., Kalogeras G., Anagnostopoulos C., Alexakos C., Munoz L. Digital Twins from Smart Manufacturing to Smart Cities: A Survey. IEEE Access. 2021;9:143222–143249. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3120843. - DOI
-
- Fuller A., Fan Z., Day C., Barlow C. Digital Twin: Enabling Technologies, Challenges and Open Research. IEEE Access. 2020;8:108952–108971. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2998358. - DOI
-
- Padovano A., Longo F., Nicoletti L., Mirabelli G. A Digital Twin Based Service Oriented Application for a 4.0 Knowledge Navigation in the Smart Factory, Elsevier. [(accessed on 2 January 2021)]. Available online: www.sciencedirect.com.
-
- Kaiblinger A., Woschank M. State of the Art and Future Directions of Digital Twins for Production Logistics: A Systematic Literature Review. Appl. Sci. 2022;12:669. doi: 10.3390/app12020669. - DOI
-
- Mukhopadhyay S.C., Tyagi S.K.S., Suryadevara N.K., Piuri V., Scotti F., Zeadally S. Artificial Intelligence-based Sensors for Next Generation IoT Applications: A Review. IEEE Sensors J. 2021;21:24920–24932. doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2021.3055618. - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
