Baveno VI and VII criteria are not suitable for screening for large varices or clinically significant portal hypertension in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma
- PMID: 37300315
- DOI: 10.1111/apt.17599
Baveno VI and VII criteria are not suitable for screening for large varices or clinically significant portal hypertension in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma
Abstract
Background: Baveno VI and VII criteria are used in patients with cirrhosis to rule out large size oesophageal varices (EV) and rule in/out clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH).
Aim: To evaluate their diagnostic performance in these patients.
Methods: We retrospectively included all patients with Child-Pugh A cirrhosis and HCC who had endoscopy, liver stiffness measurement (LSM) and platelet count within 6 months. They were classified according to the BCLC stage. Favourable Baveno VI criteria were defined by LSM < 20 kPa and platelets > 150 G/L (to rule out large EV), favourable Baveno VII criteria if LSM ≤ 15 kPa and platelets ≥ 150 G/L (to rule out CSPH, which was defined by a HVPG ≥ 10 mm Hg.
Results: We included 185 patients; 46% were BCLC-0/A, 28% BCLC-B and 26% BCLC-C. EV were present in 44% (23% large), and HVPG ≥ 10 mm Hg in 42% (mean 8 mm Hg). In patients with favourable Baveno VI criteria, 8% of the whole cohort (Se 93%, NPV 92%), 11% of BCLC-0-A (Se 89%, NPV 89%) and 10.0% of BCLC-C patients (Se 91%, NPV 90%) had large EV. Among patients with HVPG < 10 mm Hg, 6% had large EV and 17% small. CSPH was present in 23% of patients with favourable Baveno VII criteria among the whole cohort, and in 25% of those with BCLC-0/A. The specificity of LSM ≥ 25 kPa to rule in CSPH was 48%.
Conclusions: Favourable Baveno VI criteria are not appropriate to rule out the presence of high-risk EV, or Baveno VII criteria to rule CSPH in/out in patients with HCC.
Keywords: Baveno criteria; acute variceal bleeding prophylaxis; hepatic venous pressure gradient; hepatocellular carcinoma; portal hypertension.
© 2023 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Comment in
-
Editorial: The use of Baveno VI and VII criteria in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2023 Aug;58(4):478-479. doi: 10.1111/apt.17626. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2023. PMID: 37499106 No abstract available.
-
Editorial: The use of Baveno VI and VII criteria for portal hypertension and varices in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma-Authors' reply.Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2023 Aug;58(4):480-481. doi: 10.1111/apt.17648. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2023. PMID: 37499107 No abstract available.
-
Letter: Baveno-VI criteria to exclude large varices in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma-What have we learned?Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2023 Sep;58(6):642-643. doi: 10.1111/apt.17636. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2023. PMID: 37632283 No abstract available.
References
REFERENCES
-
- De Franchis R, Bosch J, Garcia-Tsao G, Reiberger T, Ripoll C, Abraldes JG, et al. Baveno VII - renewing consensus in portal hypertension. J Hepatol. 2022;76(4):959-74.
-
- de Franchis R, Baveno VI Faculty. Expanding consensus in portal hypertension: report of the Baveno VI consensus workshop: stratifying risk and individualizing care for portal hypertension. J Hepatol. 2015;63(3):743-52.
-
- Berzigotti A, Reig M, Abraldes JG, Bosch J, Bruix J. Portal hypertension and the outcome of surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma in compensated cirrhosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hepatology. 2015;61(2):526-36.
-
- Allaire M, Rekik S, Layese R, Mumana A, Guyot E, Nkontchou G, et al. Virologic control and severity of liver disease determine survival after radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma on cirrhosis. Dig Liver Dis. 2019;51(1):86-94.
-
- Müller L, Hahn F, Mähringer-Kunz A, Stoehr F, Gairing SJ, Foerster F, et al. Prevalence and clinical significance of clinically evident portal hypertension in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing transarterial chemoembolization. United European Gastroenterology Journal. 2022;10(1):41-53.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical